How long would it take for an apple to fall to the earth

AI Thread Summary
An apple falling from the distance of the Moon would take a variable amount of time to reach Earth, depending on its initial conditions and gravitational influences. If the apple were stationary relative to the Sun, it would have an initial speed equal to Earth's orbital speed, causing it to fall towards the Sun rather than Earth. The gravitational force acting on the apple would change as it approached Earth, necessitating calculus for accurate calculations. Additionally, if the apple's trajectory brought it too close to Earth, it would be incinerated by the atmosphere. Ultimately, the apple would not fall to Earth but instead enter a heliocentric orbit, potentially nearing the Sun.
Yazz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How long would it take for an apple to fall to the Earth if it were as far away as the Moon and how do you calculate that?

And, say the apple appeared out of nowhere stationary (relative to the Sun) at that distance, would the movement of the Earth leave the apple behind or would the apple follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yazz said:
How long would it take for an apple to fall to the Earth if it were as far away as the Moon and how do you calculate that?

The force of gravity on an object is $$F=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2}$$
The force will vary as it comes near the Earth, so you would need Calculus.
If you know the force, you know the acceleration,then you can use the SUVAT equations
 
Yazz said:
And, say the apple appeared out of nowhere stationary (relative to the Sun) at that distance, would the movement of the Earth leave the apple behind or would the apple follow?

An apple stationary with respect to the sun at the distance of the moon would have a speed relative to the Earth equal to Earth's orbital speed (30 km/s) which is in far excess of escape velocity. Therefore the apple would fall into the sun and not the earth.
 
QuantumPion said:
An apple stationary with respect to the sun at the distance of the moon would have a speed relative to the Earth equal to Earth's orbital speed (30 km/s) which is in far excess of escape velocity. Therefore the apple would fall into the sun and not the earth.

Depends on the angle relative to the Earth of where the apple is.
 
Buckleymanor said:
Depends on the angle relative to the Earth of where the apple is.
Yes and no. While the apple might not fall "into" the Sun, it will fall so close to the Sun that it will still be burnt to a crisp.

Assuming that the apple's perigee is at least 100 km above the surface of the Earth (any closer and it will be burnt to a crisp by the Earth's atmosphere) means that after grazing the atmosphere and escaping the Earth's gravitational clutches, the apple will be in a heliocentric orbit with a perihelion distance of 0.8 solar radii above the surface of the Sun.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?...ntial+of+the+sun))+-+1+au)/(solar+radius)+-+1
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top