How many consecutive 1's are necessary for divisibility by a number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vespero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divisibility
Vespero
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to figure out how many successive 1's are necessary for a number composed solely of 1's to be divisible by another number x. For example, how many 1's are necessary for 1...1 to be divisible by 7? Simply performing the calculation shows that the first such number is 111111 (six 1's) which gives 15873 when divided by 7. The next such number is 111111111111 (twelve 1's) which gives 15873015873 when divided by 7. However, I am looking for a general rule or property here.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Clearly, x cannot be even, as 1...1 is never even. Similarly, x cannot be divisible by 5. x divisible by 3 also seldom works.

So, I have checked the number of 1's necessary for divisibility by several numbers x:

Choice for x: Number of 1's
x = 7: \hspace{1 in} 6, 12, 18, ..., 6n for integer n
x = 11: \hspace{1 in} 2, 4, 6, 8, ..., 2n for integer n
x = 13: \hspace{1 in} 6, 12, 18, ..., 6n for integer n
x = 17: \hspace{1 in} 16, 32, ..., 16n
x = 19: \hspace{1 in} 18, 36, ..., 18n
x = 23: \hspace{1 in} 22, 44, ..., 22n
x = 29: \hspace{1 in} 28, 56, ..., 28n
x = 49: \hspace{1 in} 42, 84, ..., 42n
x = 77: \hspace{1 in} 6, 12, 18, ..., 6n

So, for most prime numbers p, it seems like the necessary number of successive 1's is (p-1)n for positive integers n. However, for x = 11, only multiples of 2 are necessary, and for x = 13, we have multiples of 6. For the last two values of x, I tried composite numbers that were multiples of values of x I had already tried. For x = 49 = 7*7, notice that our numbers of 1's are 7 times the corresponding values for x = 7. For x = 77, they are 3 times the corresponding values for x = 11. So, in general it seems like if x = p a prime, we have (p-1)n, but x = 11 and x = 13 break this rule. Similarly, composites seem to behave differently depending on the divisibility properties of their prime factors. Could anyone offer any insight and help me figure out a pattern?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vespero said:
x divisible by 3 also seldom works.

It actually works 1/3 of the time, only when the number of 1's in the number equals 3n, with n being any non-negative integer.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top