MHB How many factors does the number 19 x 29 x 59 x 79 have?

  • Thread starter Thread starter justinepark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factors
justinepark
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Having trouble with this problem, appreciate help.

Excluding 1 and itself, how many factors does the number 19 x 29 x 59 x 79 have?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
justinepark said:
Having trouble with this problem, appreciate help.

Excluding 1 and itself, how many factors does the number 19 x 29 x 59 x 79 have?

$$n=p_1^{a_1} p_2^{a_2} \dots p_k^{a_k}$$
where $p_i$ are primes ($p_i \neq p_j$) and $a_i >0$.

The number of factors of $n$ is equal to $$\tau(n)=(a_1+1)(a_2+1) \dots (a_k+1)$$
 
justinepark said:
Having trouble with this problem, appreciate help.

Excluding 1 and itself, how many factors does the number 19 x 29 x 59 x 79 have?

the number $19 *29 *59 * 79$ is product of 4 primes and for each factor there is choice of 2 for each prime so 2^4 ot 16 factors as per How to Find How Many Factors Are in a Number: 4 Steps

to illustrate the factors are

1 $19^0*29^0*59^0*79^0$ or 1
2 $19^1*29^0*59^0*79^0$ or 19
3 $19^0*29^1*59^0*79^0$ or 29
4 $19^1*29^1*59^0*79^0$ or 19 * 29
5 $19^0*29^0*59^1*79^0$ or 59
6 $19^1*29^0*59^1*79^0$ or 19 * 59
7 $19^0*29^1*59^1*79^0$ or 29 * 59
8 $19^1*29^1*59^1*79^0$ or 19 * 29 * 79

and 8 product of the above combinations and 79

if one has to exclude 1and itself then 14 factors
 
kaliprasad said:
the number $19 *29 *59 * 79$ is product of 4 primes and for each factor there is choice of 2 for each prime so 2^4 ot 16 factors as per How to Find How Many Factors Are in a Number: 4 Steps

to illustrate the factors are

1 $19^0*29^0*59^0*79^0$ or 1
2 $19^1*29^0*59^0*79^0$ or 19
3 $19^0*29^1*59^0*79^0$ or 29
4 $19^1*29^1*59^0*79^0$ or 19 * 29
5 $19^0*29^0*59^1*79^0$ or 59
6 $19^1*29^0*59^1*79^0$ or 19 * 59
7 $19^0*29^1*59^1*79^0$ or 29 * 59
8 $19^1*29^1*59^1*79^0$ or 19 * 29 * 79

and 8 product of the above combinations and 79

if one has to exclude 1and itself then 14 factors

That's right!

Using the formula I wrote in my previous post, we have the following:

$$n=19^1 \cdot 29^1 \cdot 59^1 \cdot 79^1$$

$$\tau{(19 \cdot 29 \cdot 59 \cdot 79)}=2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2=2^4=16$$

At the $16$ factors, $1$ and itself are included.

Therefore, the number of factors excluding $1$ and itself is equal to $14$.
 
Well, it's more or less enough to note that $\tau$ is multiplicative instead of using that formula : elts of $\{19, 29, 59, 79\}$ are pairwise coprime. Indeed, they are all primes.

$$\tau(19 \cdot 29 \cdot 59 \cdot 79) = \tau(19) \cdot \tau(29) \cdot \tau(59) \cdot \tau(79) = 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 \cdot 2 = 2^4$$

In an "english" translation, if $p$ is a prime then there are only two factors of $p$ : $\{1, p\}$. For $p_1 \cdot p_2 \cdot p_3 \cdot p_4$, $p_i$s being prime, looking for number of factors is essentially equivalent to finding how many ways one can pick a single ball from each box, given 4 boxes with 2 balls inside marked as $1$ and $p$. It's an easy exercise in combinatorics to show that there are indeed $2^4$ ways to do it.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top