How Many Liters of CO2 Does Eating a Giant Gummy Bear Produce?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ngu9997
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2 Gas produced
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the amount of CO2 produced from consuming a giant gummy bear containing 1479 grams of glucose. The user proposes using the cellular respiration equation to convert grams of glucose into moles and subsequently into liters of CO2. They express uncertainty about their approach and whether to apply the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) for the conversion. The consensus is that their method is correct, and they should use body temperature and standard atmospheric pressure for the calculations. This approach will yield an accurate estimate of CO2 exhalation from consuming the gummy bear.
ngu9997
Messages
27
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


(problem won't be word for word, because much of the info. is to throw people off); This large gummy bear, which contains 51 servings and each serving contains 29 grams of carbs. Assuming all the carbs are glucose, how many liters of CO2 would eating this gummy bear cause one to exhale.

Homework Equations


Not a specific equation I'm thinking.

The Attempt at a Solution


So since there is 51 servings with each serving containing 29 grams of carbs, the total amount of carbs which is glucose in this case is 1479 grams. I started out with the equation for cellular respiration:
C6H12O6 + 6 O2 → 6 H2O + 6CO2 + energy. I'm thinking I should take 1479 grams, divide it by the molar mass of glucose, and then convert it to moles of glucose, then moles of CO2. But instead of moles I should treat them as liters instead. Would this get me the right answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ngu9997 said:
Would this get me the right answer?
Do you have any specific doubts about this strategy?
 
Yeah I don't feel like I'm doing it right. Would doing all the stoichiometry I stated above to find the moles of CO2 and using PV=nRT work? If so, would the temperature be body temp and would the pressure be 1 atm?
 
ngu9997 said:
Would doing all the stoichiometry I stated above to find the moles of CO2 and using PV=nRT work? If so, would the temperature be body temp and would the pressure be 1 atm?

Yes, yes, yes and yes.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top