RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
Mark44 those are some nice bikes! I always liked kick start bikes rather than electrical start. (I prefer to kick start my scooter) Those bikes look bad! Not sure what you mean about how the left handle grip times the spark. I'll have to look into that.
Both of the older bikes started life with points ignitions, with no auto-advance. What this means is that you retard the spark timing a bit when you start the motor, and when it catches, you twist the grip to fully advance the timing. I took the points out of the panhead (center bike) and am now running an electronic ignition, so instead of points opening and closing to induce a current in the secondary winding of the coil, a magnet spins around inside the spark timer and induces a Hall effect (I think) current in the coil. Points used to be used in cars, but I doubt that any use this technology any more.
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
The two older bikes are "hard" tails right? Hence the springs under the seat?
Yep. They're also called "rigid". The tires are fairly low pressure (~18 psi), so there's some give there that you wouldn't have on newer bikes. The springer front suspension only gives you about 2 inches of travel, so if you hit a pothole at about 50, you really know it. The pogo seat has about 6" of travel, so it can soak up a lot of road bumps. The panhead is surprisingly comfortable on a ride.
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
How many miles have you logged in each one?
About 3000 mi on the panhead, but only about 1000 mi on the flathead (yellow bike), since I had it apart for so long. I've put around 45,000 mi on the Superglide. The '84 shovelhead I've had for the least time, so not many miles on it.
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
And how often or how many times have you had to rebuild the engine?
Panhead - none, although I have done a lot of work on other parts of the bike. A year ago I had it down to the motor in the frame and front end, and everything else off - tanks, dash, oil tank, transmission, rear wheel, seat, carb and manifold. I bought it from a guy several years ago who had put it together from a motor that he said was rebuilt. When I got it, it was hard to start, ran terrible, didn't get all four gears, and wasn't charging. In short, it needed a lot of relatively minor TLC to make it dependable. It now runs very strong and is a lot of fun to ride. Almost every time I ride the older bikes, someone will come up and comment on them.
WL - (yellow bike) - I did a top-end overhaul after I determined that the compression was very low. That wound up entailing getting the cylinders sleeved, plus new pistons and rings. I sent the cylinders off for the resleeving work, but everything else I did myself. I'm just now breaking it in, and am up to 300 miles on this overhaul. I took it for a ride today, and I finally seem to be getting it to run right - there's a bit of tinkering with the carburetor to get the jet dialed in.
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
(I want to get an older motorcycle, but know that with high miles, they may need a rebuild.
I don't know what years you're considering, but a lot of older bikes have already been rebuilt, some more than once.