How many terms do we need to sum for accurate result in alternate series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Remainder Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the number of terms needed to sum an alternating series, specifically the series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}}\), to achieve a specified accuracy of less than 0.01. The original poster presents the series and outlines their understanding of its convergence properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the terms of the series and the required accuracy, questioning how to assess the number of terms needed based on the differences between consecutive terms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the properties of the series and how to approach the problem of determining the necessary number of terms. There is a focus on understanding the implications of the terms' behavior and the conditions for convergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the absolute values of the terms and the decreasing nature of the sequence in relation to the specified error threshold.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
How many terms of the series do we need to add in order to find the sum to the indicated accuracy?

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}}[/tex], [tex]| error | < 0.01[/tex]. So, [tex]b_{n} = \frac{1}{n^{2}}[/tex]. [tex]b_{n} < b_{n+1}[/tex], and [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} b_{n} = 0[/tex]. Therefore, the series is convergent. I wrote out some terms of the series: [tex]s = 1-\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{9}-\frac{1}{16}+\frac{1}{25}-\frac{1}{36}+\frac{1}{49}-\frac{1}{64}+\frac{1}{81}-\frac{1}{100}+\frac{1}{121}+ . . .[/tex]. From this step, how do we determine the number of terms we need to add in order to find the sum to the indicated accuracy?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the easy answer is if |b_n| is decreasing, then the sum of the entire series lies between any two consecutive partial sums.
 
oh ok, so just look at the difference between a [tex]b_{n+1}-b_{n}[/tex] and see if it is less than [tex]0.01[/tex]? And [tex]n[/tex] is the number of terms you need?
 
That's the basic idea. (You wanted absolute value, BTW) I don't think there's an off-by-one error either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K