How many times does a atom excitate when light shines onto it?

AI Thread Summary
Atoms can be excited multiple times per second when illuminated by light, with the number of excitations depending on factors like photon flux and the probability of interaction. If 1000 photons hit an atom in one second, it could theoretically excite the atom 1000 times, but not all photons will interact due to statistical variations and the atom's decay time. The likelihood of excitation varies based on the atom's properties and the energy of the incoming photons. Additionally, the fewer atoms present, the lower the chance of a photon interacting with an atom. Ultimately, the excitation frequency is influenced by the atom's decay time and the intensity of the light source.
whattahw
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Noob question ahead.

So basically I'm reading about atoms and photons in my textbook at the moment and I came across excitation and why atoms emit photos with certain wavelengths when hit by white light. The claptrap doesn't really matter, what I'm confused and curious about is how many times does an atom "excite" every second when light shines onto it.

I've understood that when photos hit an atom, i.e. hydrogen the electrons around the nucleus gets excited and jumps up one energy level(orbital), and when they "fall" down again, the difference in energy is what gets emitted as a photon. This is the part that I am curious about. If a 1000 photos hit an atom a second does that basically mean that the single atom gets excited 1000 times and emits 1000 photos with the wavelength that accompanies that change in energy.

Please help, thank you.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Try to estimate how many photons you shine onto your sample per, say, 1 second.

Then try to estimate how many atoms the photons are illuminating.

The ratio is the maximum average number of excitations. There will be a statistical distribution, of course, so some atoms get excited more often than others. But at least this gives you a ballpark number. Also, this assumes that every photon that his the sample actually excites an atom. This is not always the case.

The fewer atoms you have, e.g. if you decrease the pressure in a gas, the smaller is the chance that a photon "hits" an atom and excites it. Most photons will simply be transmitted without interacting with the atoms.
 
Sorry for the very late response, but forgot about this and been busy. If you do have the patience though, could you please link me to the formula for calculating photos per second. In my book, they expect you to manipulate and use the wave formula together with the formula for wavelength energy formula or something, here; E = h * f
Nowhere in the book does it say how to do this, but I tried manipulating the formulas a tiny bit and noticed that it has something to do with the Planck constant, but my answers seem rather inconsistent, but please correct me thank you.
 
The answer to your question depends on at least two things:

1. How likely the atom is to be excited by a passing photon.
2. How long it takes for the excited state to decay.

If your atom simply doesn't have time to decay from its excited state before the next photon "hits", then it won't absorb the photon. The amount of time an atom remains in an excited state can be very different for different states, so there is no single answer to your question.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top