How Many Universes Exist in the Multiverse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed_usa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiverse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the multiverse and the current understanding of its existence. There is no concrete evidence supporting the existence of multiple universes beyond our own, leading to the conclusion that we may be the only universe. The multiverse theory serves as a speculative framework to address phenomena like the fine-tuning of our universe's properties, but its testability remains uncertain. The conversation also touches on the historical relationship between science and philosophy, suggesting that while science has evolved separately, philosophical considerations still influence scientific inquiry. Overall, the multiverse remains a conjectural idea lacking empirical support.
Ahmed_usa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So i just got started with multiverse. I have a few questions.

Do we now know how many other universes are there other than ours?

Where is or which one is ours? Like the lowest or the highest or we are at the bottom or at the top in whatever measure that there is?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Ahmed_usa said:
So i just got started with multiverse. I have a few questions.

Do we now know how many other universes are there other than ours?

None as far as can be shown by any actual evidence.

Where is or which one is ours? Like the lowest or the highest or we are at the bottom or at the top in whatever measure that there is?

We are the only one, as far as can be determined.

Multiverse proposals are just that ... proposals with zero evidence.
 
The multiverse idea is handy for explaining away things like fine tuning of the properties of our universe. It is unclear if or how the hypothesis is even testable. That puts it squarely in the realm of conjecture, IMO.
 
Philosophy and science have long had a kind of uneasy friendship. Back in the old days, "natural philosophy" was considered the same thing as science, but that was before scientific epistemology was better established, and the distinctions between science and philosophy became more clear. Galileo's observations of the "flaws" in astronomical objects, objects considered on philosophical grounds to be perfect, was a nice example of that dichotomy. One might even be tempted to conclude that the break from philosophy was the single most important step in the advancement of science, though one must not go too far and imagine that the break was complete. Science uses philosophy all the time, indeed it is philosophy that decides the parameters of science. But like the prodigal son, it has left to find its own way, with an oftimes irreverant attitude about its philosophical ancestry! In the multiverse, we find the prodigal son returned home, and the conversation between the child and the parent is interesting to eavesdrop on, as that Wiki article clearly shows.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
184
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top