How many ways can 12 people be divided into 3 equal groups?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abeen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grouping
abeen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The number of ways in which 12 people may be divided into 3 equal groups is_
My ans is 12C4*8C4*4C4=34650.
But my test book contains the answer 5775.
So iam confused. Is my answer correct or am i missing something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
abeen said:
i missing something?

Just that you are counting all possible orderings of the groups. What I mean is that if you have one particular grouping say { {1 2 3 4} {5 6 7 8} {9 10 11 12} } you are counting that same thing six times over (assuming that the ordering of the groups doesn't matter).

{ {1 2 3 4} {5 6 7 8} {9 10 11 12} }
{ {1 2 3 4} {9 10 11 12} {5 6 7 8} }
{ {5 6 7 8} {1 2 3 4} {9 10 11 12} }
{ {5 6 7 8} {9 10 11 12} {1 2 3 4} }
{ {9 10 11 12} {1 2 3 4} {5 6 7 8} }
{ {9 10 11 12} {5 6 7 8} {1 2 3 4} }

You just need to divide your answer by six (3!) to correct this.
 
Last edited:
Thank you uart.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top