How Much CCl4 Remains Liquid at Equilibrium in a Sealed Flask?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining how much liquid carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) remains in a sealed flask at equilibrium after injecting 5.00 mL into a 5.00 L container at 30.0°C. The vapor pressure of CCl4 at this temperature is 143.0 mmHg, which converts to 0.188 atm. The calculation involves using the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) to find the moles of gaseous CCl4, which is 0.0377 moles, and then determining the moles of liquid remaining by subtracting the gaseous moles from the total moles injected. The key point of confusion is whether to use the total container volume or the free volume when calculating vapor pressure, with clarification that the effective volume should account for the liquid remaining. Ultimately, the calculations indicate that some liquid CCl4 will remain after equilibrium is reached.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If 5.00 mL of liquid carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, density = 1.587 g/mL) was injected into a sealed 5.00 L flask at 30.0°C, what volume (if any) of the CCl4 would remain as liquid after equilibrium is reached? (the vapor pressure of CCl4 at 30.0°C is 143.0 mmHg)

Homework Equations



Divide mm Hg by 760 to yield pressure in atm.

PV=nRT

Vapor pressure = pressure of liquid solution at equilibrium.

The Attempt at a Solution



VP = 0.188 atm = 143 / 760. I know this.

P(solution) = nRT/V.

Do I set this equal to the VP? This seems rather unlikely as I'd have to solve for two variables at once - the volume of the liquid solution - and the moles of the liquid left.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculate how much gaseous CCl4 would be present assuming saturated vapor. If it is lower than the amount present - there will be some liquid left. If it is higher than the amount present - all CCl4 will evaporate and there will be no saturated vapor.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Using P=nRT/V I found the moles of gaseous CCl4 present assuming saturated vapor. I found there was 0.0377 moles of CCl4(g).

I then found the grams of CCl4 added to the container by multiplying milliliters by density. I then found the moles of CCl4 present by dividing grams by molar mass. Subtracting the gaseous number of moles from the total number of moles injected we can find the number of moles of CCl4(l). That number is 0.014 moles.

We can then convert moles back into grams and back into volume given density.

Question:

1) Vapor pressure of gaseous CCl4 = nRT/V. What should my value for V be? Container volume, or free volume - 5 milliliters subtracted from 5 liters?

I'm guessing the amount of CCl4 injected is purposely small so it doesn't matter on a multiple-choice test, and that it's sort of hard to guess the free volume given that we're supposed to be finding the amount of volume of liquid CCl4 remaining.
 
Qube said:
1) Vapor pressure of gaseous CCl4 = nRT/V. What should my value for V be? Container volume, or free volume - 5 milliliters subtracted from 5 liters?

To be exact - neither. It should be 5L minus the volume of the liquid left (which, as you already know, is lower than 5 mL). But error you are making using 5L is negligible.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top