Schools How much does faculty matter in getting admission to top graduate schools?

AI Thread Summary
To gain admission into top graduate physics and engineering programs, attending research universities with faculty from prestigious institutions like MIT, Stanford, and UC-Berkeley can be advantageous. The discussion highlights concerns about choosing the University of Notre Dame, which prioritizes undergraduate teaching over research, compared to CU-Boulder, known for its strong research programs and faculty from top universities. While having an adviser from a well-regarded school can enhance opportunities, the choice of university should align with personal fit and available resources. Participants emphasize the importance of making the most of the chosen institution, suggesting that quality education and opportunities can still be found at Notre Dame. Engaging in research experiences, such as REUs, can also bolster graduate school applications. Ultimately, the focus should be on leveraging the strengths of the chosen university.
pnptruong
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I heard that in order to get into top graduate physics(and engineering) programs, people should go to research universities that have professor obtaining their PhD degrees from top universities such as MIT, Stanford, UC-Berkeley, Caltech. Is that true?

I feel really bad about my recent college decision: I chose the University of Notre Dame over CU-Boulder, my state school because they offered me a full ride. Notre Dame, though categorized as a national university, does not invest a lot in research but commits to undergrad teaching instead. Therefore, there're only a few of their faculty coming from top research universities.
CU-Boulder, on the other hand, is well-known for their research in engineering and physics programs and most of their faculty come from top universities.

Although Notre Dame is pouring a lot of money into their science and engineering programs, I doubt that there will be a drastic change in faculty while I attend the university.

Did I make a wrong choice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that true?
Kind of, but not quite. Some professors* look at your adviser when deciding whether to take you into their labs/fund you, so having an adviser they know gives you an automatic boost 'cause your adviser is basically vouching that you're not a total waste of funding. A lot of professors happened to have gone to the top schools, so that's the pool they know, and 10-20 years ago, that's who was doing a lot of research, but some of the best known people are at the most random schools.

*This is what my adviser and other professors I've talked to have said.

pnptruong said:
Did I make a wrong choice?
*shrugs* You chose the school that you thought fit you best, so make the best of it. I also chose the school that gave me a free ride, but accidentally landed an adviser from a big name school 'cause I paid attention when someone spoke to me. Your school is going to have its own awesome things for you to take advantage of, so make the most of it and you'll be fine.

but commits to undergrad teaching instead
Congrats, you may get a quality education. Having had far too many awful but well funded professors, I'm envious of anyone at a school that actually values education.

If it really bothers you, just go out and apply for REUs.
 
If it helps any, my friend from Notre Dame is finishing his first year as a PhD student in physics at Princeton.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top