How Much Energy Is Released When Mixing HCl and NaOH?

AI Thread Summary
The enthalpy of neutralization for mixing hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is -56 kJ/mol of water produced. To calculate the energy released when 195.0 mL of 0.400 M HCl is mixed with 155.5 mL of 0.500 M NaOH, the moles of each reactant must be determined using the formula n = c * V. The total moles calculated were incorrect, leading to an erroneous energy release of -8.722 kJ. It is essential to ensure that all moles of the reactants are accounted for and to write the balanced reaction equation to verify the stoichiometry. Properly identifying the limiting reactant will clarify the correct amount of energy released.
JessicaHelena
Messages
188
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The enthalpy of neutralization for the reaction of a strong acid with a strong base is -56 kJ/mol of water produced. How much energy will be released when 195.0 mL of 0.400 M HCl is mixed with 155.5 mL of 0.500 M NaOH?

Homework Equations


c=n/V

The Attempt at a Solution


to get n (from c=n/V), we can do c*V.
In this case, the total moles is then 0.4*.195 + .1555 * 0.5 moles
and multiplying that by -56kJ/mol gave me -8.722 kJ, but that's wrong... Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do all moles react ? Write out the 'reaction' equation and underneath put the # of moles for each.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top