How Much Friction is Desirable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sidelines
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the balance of friction in a car's wheels, emphasizing that too much friction can slow down the vehicle while too little can lead to slipping. It highlights that rolling resistance, particularly with rubber tires, contributes significantly to energy loss due to tire distortion and internal hysteresis. Steel wheels on steel rails are noted for their efficiency due to reduced contact area and distortion, though they face limitations in acceleration due to low static friction. The conversation suggests that for a 1 kg toy car, rubber tires are generally sufficient, but optimizing for specific performance metrics like acceleration and top speed may require further analysis. Ultimately, understanding the dynamics of static versus sliding friction is crucial for enhancing vehicle performance.
Sidelines
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Given a set of wheels connected with a frame and chassis (a typical car), on a surface, how much friction is desirable? Too much friction would slow the car down, where as too little would cause slipping.
A specific example would be four equal wheels with a frame and body, around 1 kg on a wooden surface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sidelines said:
Too much friction would slow the car down ...
Rolling resistance slows a car. Friction should not be much of a factor (unless tire surfaces start to act as adhesives). Wiki article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance
 
rcgldr said:
Rolling resistance slows a car. Friction should not be much of a factor (unless tire surfaces start to act as adhesives). Wiki article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance

With rubber tyres, there is a significant loss due to friction with the road because the tyre is constantly distorting as it comes in contact with the ground and the tread pattern 'scuffs'.
Steel wheels on steel rails are a lot more efficient as the contact area and the distortion are reduced but the low (static) friction limits acceleration (+ and -).
 
You are probably overthinking it. Rubber tires should do fine for a 1kg toy car. If it is important to optimize it, you need specific information about the acceleration and top speed of the car.
 
Khashishi said:
You are probably overthinking it. Rubber tires should do fine for a 1kg toy car. If it is important to optimize it, you need specific information about the acceleration and top speed of the car.

What, on PF? This is angels on a pinhead land.
 
sophiecentaur said:
With rubber tyres ... high rolling resistance.
Relatively stiff rubber tires, either very high perssure, or solid rubber tires, reduce rolling resistance, but generally have less grip.
 
sophiecentaur said:
With rubber tyres, there is a significant loss due to friction with the road because the tyre is constantly distorting as it comes in contact with the ground and the tread pattern 'scuffs'.
Actually most of the resistance is internal due to hysteresis of the rubber; not much scuffing going on.
 
I was thinking in terms of wear as being evidence of scuffing but I guess that is only a small fraction of the contribution to the heating up of the tyres due to internal losses when traveling (a good indicator of energy loss).
 
Sidelines said:
Too much friction would slow the car down, where as too little would cause slipping.
sliding friction / aerodynamic friction / tire deformation : BAD (creates resistance)
static friction : GOOD (provides traction)
 
  • #10
How could I optimize static friction in tires and downscale the bad friction forces?
This is more for thought than actual results if the whole 1 kg car seemed pointless.
 
Back
Top