How Much Is a Charged Bullet Deflected by Earth's Magnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the deflection of a charged bullet traveling through Earth's magnetic field. The bullet, with a charge of 1.36×10−8C and a speed of 165 m/s, experiences a magnetic force calculated using the equation F = qv x B. This force leads to centripetal acceleration, causing the bullet to follow a circular arc rather than a straight path. The radius of this arc is extraordinarily large, resulting in a minimal angular deflection of approximately 1.80×10^-9 radians over a distance of 1.35 km. Ultimately, the deflection is negligible, indicating that the bullet's trajectory remains nearly straight despite the magnetic influence.
ts174ab2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A 3.10 bullet moves with a speed of 165 m/s perpendicular to the Earth's magnetic field of 5.00x10^-5.

If the bullet possesses a net charge of 1.36×10−8C , by what distance will it be deflected from its path due to the Earth's magnetic field after it has traveled 1.35km ?

Could anyone give me a hand (ie.equation)?
I have no idea how to start the question...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the information available to calculate the magnetic force on the bullet, from F = qv x B. This will give you the magnitude of the force, from which you can find an acceleration. Keep in mind that, since this is a magnetic field, the force and acceleration you have found are centripetal, so the bullet would be moving on a circular arc.

This means that the 1.35 km. is measured along the arc. You can also work out the radius of the circle, knowing the relationship for centripetal force. This will tell you the angle on the circle through which the bullet moves. Geometry will then give you the amount by which the bullet will have been deflected from the straight line it was traveling on initially.
 
dynamicsolo said:
You can use the information available to calculate the magnetic force on the bullet, from F = qv x B. This will give you the magnitude of the force, from which you can find an acceleration. Keep in mind that, since this is a magnetic field, the force and acceleration you have found are centripetal, so the bullet would be moving on a circular arc.

This means that the 1.35 km. is measured along the arc. You can also work out the radius of the circle, knowing the relationship for centripetal force. This will tell you the angle on the circle through which the bullet moves. Geometry will then give you the amount by which the bullet will have been deflected from the straight line it was traveling on initially.

sorry, I didn't understand the second part.
Could you give some detail steps? thanks!
 
It is really preferable to conduct this work in the Forum, rather than by private-messaging. For one thing, not having replies posted here makes it look like the thread is inactive; other helpers will assume your question is not being answered and will start posting when it may not actually be necessary for them to do so.

To continue from your PMs, you got a radius for the circular path of the bullet which is rather gigantic:

r = mv/qB = 7.52·10^11 m. (far larger than the Earth itself, but smaller than its orbit!)

Maybe this isn't surprising, since the charge is rather small and the bullet is enormously massive by charged particle standards.

You also found that the angle that the bullet travels along the circle is

theta = arclength/radius = 1350 m./7.52·10^11 m.
= 1.80·10^-9 radians .

Since the circle is so vast compared to the 1.35 km the bullet travels on it, we can pretty well take the path of the bullet to be a straight line, but now turned 1.8·10^-9 radians from its original direction.

You can then use the "skinny-triangle" approximation to find how much the bullet has been deflected from where it would have arrived after moving the 1350 meters. (It's mighty dang little: this is probably the point of the problem...)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top