How Much of a Human Can Be Replaced Before They're Not Considered Human Anymore?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JulieVA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the threshold of human identity in relation to mechanical and non-organic replacements in the body. Key points include the subjective nature of defining what constitutes a human, with some suggesting that retaining the brain and memories is essential for maintaining human status. The role of the heart in influencing brain function is also mentioned, implying that certain organic components may be necessary. The conversation references the Turing test, highlighting that appearance and behavior may influence perceptions of humanity. Ultimately, the idea emerges that memories could be the core of human identity, regardless of the physical form, while acknowledging that current technology limits the extent of biological replacement. The topic raises questions about future legal definitions of personhood in light of advancing prosthetic technologies.
JulieVA
How much of a human's body can be replaced with mechanical devices / non organics before the human is no longer considered human?

Which parts of a human's body must remain organic for a human to still be considered human?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
This is really a subjective question, what one person thinks is human another might say is not and perhaps in the future will be coded into law.

The Turing test comes to mind which means a computer that passes the test could be considered human, right?

However if someone were to see the computer then only if it looks human, has human-like skin and hair and acts like a human then we would view it as human.

Back to your question, my guess is if the person retained his brain and memories then he/she would still be considered human although recently I read an article where the heart plays a major role in providing input to the brain so it may be needed too. Now you could dice the brain down to smaller components as long as the memories were retained then the person would still be a person which then brings you to a computer that can retain your memories.

So in the end, maybe its our memories that make us human no matter what hardware or wetware technology is used.
 
Last edited:
The legal status of personhood doesn't bother to take into account prosthetic replacement. As the amount of biological components we can replace is pretty small (and replace effectively is practically nil) this topic would require us to speculate on technologies that are nowhere near the horizon, which I'm afraid isn't a suitable topic.

Thread closed.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top