How Much Power to Generate 400,000 Gauss EMF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rayzorblades
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Gauss
AI Thread Summary
To generate a 400,000 Gauss magnetic field, approximately 40 Tesla is required. The energy needed to maintain this field is influenced by the properties of the magnet used, particularly its inductance and current. High-field electromagnets often utilize superconducting wire, allowing the power source to be turned off after reaching the desired field strength. For non-superconducting coils, voltage is necessary to maintain current, determined by the coil's resistance and current through it. An example is the NHMFL's 45T magnet, which consumes 33 MW of power.
Rayzorblades
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all, first time post here. I was curious, hypothetically, how much juice would you need to generate a 400,000 Gauss magnetic field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Awesome thanks for the link. However, is there anyway to get a volt reading on this so I can convert to watts?
 
No, because you do not need a voltage to maintain a magnetic field, the only time there needs to be a voltage across the magnet is when you are ramping up the field.
In fact, most high-field electromagnets are made from superconducting wire so once you have ramped up the field you can turn off the source.
Hence, the energy needed depends on propeties of the magnet you are using; although if you know the current an inductance you can of course just use LI^2/2 to calculate the energy stored in it.

That said, if you look at the NHMFL website you will see that their 45T magnet uses 33 MW of power (it is a hybrid magnet).

http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/mediacenter/features/meetthemagnets/hybrid.html
 
With a non-superconducting coil you do need to apply some voltage in order to maintain the current, which is what produces the magnetic field. The voltage depends on the resistance of the coil and and the current through it via Ohm's Law.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top