How much stuff will neutralise the sun's pull on the earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter bland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Pull
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the amount of protons needed to be distributed evenly through the Earth and Sun to overcome gravitational attraction with electromagnetic repulsion. It is established that the electromagnetic force is approximately 10^36 times stronger than gravity. The calculations involve using Coulomb's law and Newton's law of universal gravitation to set the forces equal, leading to the conclusion that 2 x 10^12 kg of protons would need to be added to the Sun and 6 x 10^6 kg to the Earth. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of understanding the conversion factors between charge and mass, as well as the cancellation of the radius in the equations. Overall, the thread explores the theoretical implications of balancing these fundamental forces.
bland
Messages
149
Reaction score
44
I tried to make the title as descriptive as I could without being overly long.

Anyway, I've been trying to work this out but I'm having some difficulty. We all know the strength of the electromagnetic force is very much greater than the gravitational force. I'm not sure what it is as it's a number that seems to vary between 10^35 and 10^40 times depending on the source. And the mass of the Earth is 6 x 10^24kg.

For the sake of the argument, let's call the gravitational force 10^36 times weaker than the EM force and the mass of the Earth as 10^25kg

I was trying to work out given the above numbers, how many kg's of protons would need to be evenly spread through the sun and also evenly spread through the earth, such that the electromagnetic repulsion would be enough to overcome the pull of the gravitational attraction between the two objects (sun and earth) So that the Earth would float away.

At first I thought it would be simple to work out but after thinking about it for a while I realize that I don't really know how to do this.

I hope this makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One place to start would be Coulomb's law. That gives you force in terms of charges and distance.

You'd need to figure out the distance between Earth and Sun.

You'd need to get a conversion factor between Coulombs and kilograms of protons. There are several ways to get that conversion factor. One way is to look up how many elementary charges per Coulomb, and how many elementary charges per mole. Then, a bit of background knowledge in chemistry is that 1 mole of protons (aka 1 mole of hydrogen nuclei) is 1 gram.

Then you'd need to repeat the exercise for the force of gravity between Earth and Sun. You could use the period and radius of the Earths orbit to arrive at the acceleration of the Earth in its orbit around the sun and factor in the mass of the Earth to get the force of gravity on the Earth by the sun.
 
jbriggs444 said:
One place to start would be Coulomb's law. That gives you force in terms of charges and distance.

You'd need to figure out the distance between Earth and Sun.

You'd need to get a conversion factor between Coulombs and kilograms of protons. There are several ways to get that conversion factor. One way is to look up how many elementary charges per Coulomb, and how many elementary charges per mole. Then, a bit of background knowledge in chemistry is that 1 mole of protons (aka 1 mole of hydrogen nuclei) is 1 gram.

Then you'd need to repeat the exercise for the force of gravity between Earth and Sun. You could use the period and radius of the Earths orbit to arrive at the acceleration of the Earth in its orbit around the sun and factor in the mass of the Earth to get the force of gravity on the Earth by the sun.

The radius of the orbit cancels out of the equations. No need to waste time figuring that factor.
 
dauto said:
The radius of the orbit cancels out of the equations. No need to waste time figuring that factor.

Good point, thanks. Though it depends on which known values and you Googled up to work from when computing the gravitational force and which equations you used with them.

If you calculated the gravitational force using the approach that I mentioned then would do not have a factor of 1/radius2 in the gravitational force to cancel against the factor of 1/radius2 in the electrostatic force.
 
Newton's law of universal gravitation says:

$$F_g=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{d^2}$$

Coulomb's law says:

$$F_e=\frac{kq_1q_2}{d^2}$$

Setting the two forces equal, you will get very simply:

$$k q_1 q_2=Gm_1m_2$$

If you assume ##q_1=q_2=q## you can solve that equation very easily to find q. From q, you need to use jbrigg's suggestion to find the mass of the protons involved.
 
Imagine the Earth and the sun both consisted completely of protons and had therefore a rediculous amount of charge. In that case the electric repulsion should be 10^36 times stronger than the attraction. That means the electric repulsion has to be reduced by a factor of 10^36 to make both forces equal.

That could for example be achieved by reducing the charge of both bodies by a factor of 10^18.
The sun's mass is 2 * 10^30 kg. Divided by 10^18 is 2 * 10^12 kg
Earth's mass is 6 * 10^24 kg. Divided by 10^18 = 6 * 10^6 kg

That means you'd have to add 2 * 10^12 kg of protons to the sun and 6 * 10^6 kg of protons to the earth.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
DrZoidberg said:
That means the electric repulsion has to be reduced by a factor of 10^36 to make both forces equal.

That could for example be achieved by reducing the charge of both bodies by a factor of 10^18.
The sun's mass is 2 * 10^30 kg. Divided by 10^18 is 2 * 10^12 kg
Earth's mass is 6 * 10^24 kg. Divided by 10^18 = 6 * 10^6 kg

That means you'd have to add 2 * 10^12 kg of protons to the sun and 6 * 10^6 kg of protons to the earth.

Interesting approach here. Has anyone worked it out the other way and gotten similar numbers?
 
Back
Top