How much Trig is Needed to suceed in Calc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zoiberg137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
Understanding trigonometry is essential for success in calculus, but not every detail is necessary. Key areas to focus on include the trigonometric functions, inverse functions, and important identities like sin(2x) and the sum-to-product formulas. While memorization of these identities isn't required, awareness of their existence is crucial for integration tasks. Concepts such as the cosine and sine rules, as well as triangle properties, are less relevant for calculus and can be skipped. However, familiarity with reference triangles can be beneficial, especially since they provide an alternative to the unit circle approach. Overall, a solid grasp of core trigonometric concepts will prepare you well for calculus without needing to master every aspect of trigonometry.
zoiberg137
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am studying trig on my own in order to prepare myself for calculus. Just wondering how much I need to know. For example, would being familiar with the unit circle and inverse functions suffice, or should I thoroughly study every chapter of my trig book and know every concept to the best of my ability? My last prof said that in algebra there are some concepts which really aren't necessary unless you intend to do computer programming...So I thought maybe there are some similar scenarios with trig where certain concepts just are not going to apply to calculus and beyond.

I only ask because I would like to start studying calc on my own as soon as possible so that I'm confident when I start my class, but I don't want to get ahead of myself, even if it is only self study! :)

Thanks for you input!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Trig is fairly important in calc, but you won't need to know every single detail.

The most important part of trig are the trigonometric functions and inverse functions. Especially the identities such as \sin(2x)=... and \cos(x)+\cos(a)=... are used a lot in integration.
When I say that those identities are important, that doesn't mean you need to memorize them and know how to prove them. The most important part is that you know the identity exists.

For example, if I want to integrate the function \sin(x)\cos(10x), then this is not an easy task. If it were a sum instead of a product, then it would be easy. Maybe there exists a formula that transforms a product into a sum? Knowing that such a formula indeed exists is crucial.

Things like triangles, cosine rule and sine rule are not important at all in calc. I think you can safely skip that.
 
Last edited:
One thing I've needed a couple of times so far is how to use the reference triangles. This is a trick you might not learn in self study, because everything is so unit-circle-oriented. But you can find everything by using reference triangles, and they're easy to sketch in the margins if you need them.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top