How Much Work Is Needed to Alter a Crate's Velocity?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the work needed to change a crate's velocity, the work-energy theorem is applied using the formula W=1/2mvf^2-1/2mvi^2. The initial and final velocities were broken down into their components, resulting in calculated work values for both x and y directions. The initial approach incorrectly used the Pythagorean theorem to combine these values, leading to an incorrect total work of 354.32J. The correct method involves summing the work values algebraically, as work is a scalar quantity without direction. Understanding that angles do not affect the calculation is crucial, as work only depends on the magnitudes of the velocities.
jtc143
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 34.0 kg crate is initially moving with a velocity that has magnitude 3.70 m/s in a direction 37.0 degrees west of north. How much work must be done on the crate to change its velocity to 6.08 m/s in a direction 63.0 degrees south of east?



Homework Equations


W=1/2mvf^2-1/2mvi^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted this by breaking the velocities into their components and got -2.23m/s in the initial x, 2.95m/s in the initial y, 2.76m/s in the final x, and -5.42m/s in the final y. Then I did the work-energy theorem for both x and y components and got work in x direction to be 44.96J and work in the y direction to be 351.46J. Then I did the Pythagorean theorem to get work to be 354.32J But this is wrong, can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind I figured it out. The angles mean nothing and you just do the work energy theorem normally. However, I'm not sure WHY this is so; can anyone explain why the angles do not effect the question?
 
Work, like energy, is a scalar quantity, and as such, it has no direction, only magnitude, which may be a positive or negative value. In your first attempt when you broke up the velocity into its vector components, if you did the math correctly, you get the same answer as the correct answer, provided that when you get the two values of work you then add them up algebraically, not vectorially, that is, you don't use Pythagorus (there is no direction associated with work, so just add them up).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top