How Much Work Is Needed to Launch a Weather Monitor Into Space?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done against gravity to launch a 720 kg weather monitor 120 km into the air, the gravitational potential energy (Eg) at two heights is determined using the formula Eg = -GMm/r. The initial Eg at the Earth's surface is approximately -4.50 x 10^10 J, while the Eg at 120 km is about -4.49 x 10^10 J. The change in gravitational energy (delta Eg) is calculated to be 1.0 x 10^8 J, which represents the work done against gravity. It is noted that using more significant figures in calculations is important for accuracy, and an alternative method using gravitational acceleration (g) is suggested for simplicity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of precision in calculations when dealing with closely valued numbers.
crosbykins
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How much work is done against gravity to fire a 7.2*10^2 kg weather monitor 120km into the air.

Homework Equations



Mass Earth = 5.98*10^24kg
radius of Earth = 6.38 * 10^6 m

Eg = -GMm/r

delta Eg = Eg 2 - Eg 1

The Attempt at a Solution



Eg1= -[(6.67*10^ -11N * m2 /kg2 )(5.98*1024 kg)(7.2*102 kg)] /(6.38*106 m)
= -4.50 *1010 J

Eg2= -[(6.67*10^ -11N * m2 /kg2 )(5.98*1024 kg)(7.2*102 kg)] /(6.38*106 m + 120 *103 m)
= -4.49 *1010 J

delta Eg = -4.49 *1010 J - -4.50 *1010 J
= 1.0*108 J

***my solution is based off the idea delta Eg is equal to work done...is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you just need the monitor to reach the 120km distance

so you can imagine that its velocity there is 0

so ΔKE =0

so net work done on monitor is zero

so work done by you = -(work done by gravity)
 
hi crosbykins! :smile:

(have a delta: ∆ and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
crosbykins said:
Eg1= -[(6.67*10^ -11N * m2 /kg2 )(5.98*1024 kg)(7.2*102 kg)] /(6.38*106 m)
= -4.50 *1010 J

Eg2= -[(6.67*10^ -11N * m2 /kg2 )(5.98*1024 kg)(7.2*102 kg)] /(6.38*106 m + 120 *103 m)
= -4.49 *1010 J

delta Eg = -4.49 *1010 J - -4.50 *1010 J
= 1.0*108 J

***my solution is based off the idea delta Eg is equal to work done...is this correct?

yes, but that 4.50 - 4.49 looks very inaccurate …

you should use at least two more significant figures in your intermediate calculations if you're gong to subtract two numbers that are so close :wink:

(btw, you could have avoided using G by using g = 9.81 and GM/R = R*GM/R2 = Rg, and then using R/(R+h))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top