I How on Earth This is possible? (distance to a far galaxy)

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Prof Sabi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Galaxy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the galaxy ESO 325-G004, located 450 million light years away, which serves as a rare cosmic alignment between us and a more distant galaxy, currently 17 billion light years away. This alignment challenges common perceptions of cosmic distances, as the light from the distant galaxy has taken a significant amount of time to reach us, but the universe's expansion means its current distance is greater than when the light was emitted. Participants clarify that in an expanding universe, the distance light travels increases over time, leading to the conclusion that the time taken for light to reach us is longer than the simple calculation of distance divided by the speed of light. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of measuring cosmic distances and the implications for understanding the universe's age and expansion. This highlights the ongoing relevance of Einstein's theory of general relativity in explaining such phenomena.
Prof Sabi
Messages
33
Reaction score
4
https://amp.scroll.in/article/88372...ivity-holds-true-even-beyond-the-solar-system

Read the Section in this link:
Cosmic alignment
The galaxy we investigated has the catchy name ESO 325-G004 – let’s call it E325. Located some 450m light years away, it is one of the closest examples of a rare cosmic alignment – sitting directly between us and a second, more distant, galaxy. The background galaxy in this case is some 17 billion light years further behind. The centres of these two galaxies are aligned to better than one ten-thousandth of a degree.

17 billion light years? Isn't the universe 13.7 billion years old?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
At 17 Gly is where it is now, not at the time when it emitted the light that is captured in the picture.
 
BvU said:
At 17 Gly is where it is now, not at the time when it emitted the light that is captured in the picture.
Need a lil elaboration :eek: ... as I am imagining in this way that the light from that Galaxy literally took 17 billion years to travel to us in with velocity 'c'.
 
Prof Sabi said:
Need a lil elaboration :eek: ... as I am imagining in this way that the light from that Galaxy literally took 17 billion years to travel to us in with velocity 'c'.
Let's say the light is emitted at a distance D from the observer. In a non-expanding universe, that initial distance would remain constant in time, and it'd take t=D/c to cover the distance.
In an expanding universe, as the light travels, the distance D grows - both in the part that the light still has to cover, and the part already covered.
This means that the time needed to reach the observer is higher than t=D/c, and the distance at which the source galaxy ends up being by the time of reception is higher than the initial distance D.

edit: typo
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes alantheastronomer, davenn and jim mcnamara
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top