Schools How reputable are british universities among engineering employers in America

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perception of British universities, particularly Oxbridge and Imperial College, among US employers in the engineering sector. It highlights that these institutions are generally well-regarded, but emphasizes the challenges faced by British and European engineers in securing H1B visa sponsorship from American firms. The conversation notes that the H1B visa process is complicated by misuse by software companies, leading to increased scrutiny and political pressure, making it harder for engineers from regions like the UK to obtain sponsorship compared to candidates from India and China. Additionally, it points out that new graduates from American universities have an advantage in certification processes, which can further complicate the job market for foreign engineers.
Link
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
I got a feeling that most discussions about university reputation here revolves around American Universities. What do US employers in the engineering field think of British universities, Oxbridge and imperial college in particular?

And while we're at it, is it harder for british / European engineers to get american engineering firms to sponsor you for H1B visas compared to engineers from for example India and China?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think British universities are pretty well regarded (at least the top few)
The problem with H1Bs is that they are rather abused by software companies so it's difficult for any other company to get one, there are also increasing political pressures against them. Finally being on an H1B sucks unless you are treating it as a short term experience thing.

Assuming you are a new grad there are still a lot of american general eng grads around and it's easier for them to get certification if you are in an area where that matters.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top