How Should Negative Improvement Be Recorded in Pre-Post Test Data Analysis?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter craig100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the appropriate method for recording negative improvements in pre-post test data analysis. The user, Craig, presents data from two groups, highlighting that Group 2 has negative improvements when calculating the difference between pre and post-test results. The consensus is that negative improvements should be recorded as such, as they reflect a decrease in performance, and using negative values can yield significant statistical differences when applying the t-test. Additionally, representing these improvements as negative percentages is acceptable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pre-post test data analysis
  • Familiarity with t-tests and statistical significance
  • Knowledge of how to calculate improvements and percentages
  • Basic statistics concepts, including mean and variance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of t-tests with small sample sizes
  • Learn about statistical significance and its implications in data analysis
  • Explore methods for visualizing pre-post test data
  • Study the interpretation of negative values in statistical reporting
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data analysts, educators conducting assessments, and researchers involved in experimental design and analysis.

craig100
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello There,

I'm after a little advice; I have data collected during experimentation that was designed to determine the improvement of two groups of subjects between a pre and a post-test. The results are as follows:
Pre & Post test numbers represent the number of errors made
Group 1:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	0	0
1	0	1
5	4	1
12	0	12
2	0	2
7	6	1
0	0	0
13	0	13

Group 2:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	1	-1
2	0	2
1	0	1
0	0	0
0	11	-11
5	23	-18

I'm applying the t-test to determine if there is a statistical difference between the means(of the improvement columns).

My question is really simple(hopefully)... in group 2, should I be recording improvement as a negative number? or simply zero?

Using zero will not give me a significant statistical difference between the means of group 1 and group 2... using the negative numbers does.

Also, if I'm keeping the negative improvement numbers, is it okay to represent improvement as a negative percentage?

I've not done much with statistics, so would appreciate your input.

Thanks,
Craig.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
craig100 said:
Hello There,

I'm after a little advice; I have data collected during experimentation that was designed to determine the improvement of two groups of subjects between a pre and a post-test. The results are as follows:
Pre & Post test numbers represent the number of errors made
Group 1:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	0	0
1	0	1
5	4	1
12	0	12
2	0	2
7	6	1
0	0	0
13	0	13

Group 2:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	1	-1
2	0	2
1	0	1
0	0	0
0	11	-11
5	23	-18

I'm applying the t-test to determine if there is a statistical difference between the means(of the improvement columns).

My question is really simple(hopefully)... in group 2, should I be recording improvement as a negative number? or simply zero?

Using zero will not give me a significant statistical difference between the means of group 1 and group 2... using the negative numbers does.

Also, if I'm keeping the negative improvement numbers, is it okay to represent improvement as a negative percentage?

I've not done much with statistics, so would appreciate your input.

Thanks,
Craig.

Since you are subtracting in the order Pre-Post, a negative difference indicates a higher value in the post data - that's what you are hoping to find, if I understand you correctly.

Note that you are free to subtract in either order: if the negative differences are giving you a conceptual problem, subtract in the other order.

I would be more concerned about doing t-tests with such small samples.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K