How Steep is the Hill if a Car Uses More Power Climbing It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter curly_ebhc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the inclination of a hill based on a car's power usage while climbing and descending. The car, with a mass of 1900 kg and traveling at a speed of 27 m/s, requires an additional 49 horsepower (35,000 W) to ascend compared to descending. The user sets up the problem using energy principles, calculating the change in potential energy and determining the hill's height to be 0.92 m. By forming a right triangle with the hill's height and distance traveled, they find the angle of inclination to be approximately 1.95 degrees. The user seeks confirmation of their calculations and suggests providing the final answer with two significant figures.
curly_ebhc
Messages
35
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


There is a car of mass 1900kg that travels at a steady speed of 27 m/s up and down a hill. The force of friction is the same in both directions and it takes 49 more horsepower to go up the hill than down the hill. What is the inclination of the hill.

Given: mass of car= 1900kg , velocity = 27 m/s, difference in power =49 hp =35000 W.

I set it up as an energy problem. First I got rid of time and set that for every second the car traveled 27 m and the difference in the (change in) energy was 35000 J.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Step 1: I set ∆PE(up) -∆PE(down) = 35000J
Then 2∆PE(up)=35000J

Step 2: I used potential energy

h= 35000J/[2(1900kg)(10 m/s2) = .92 m

Step 3: A set up a right triangle: hypotenuse=27m and height=.92m

I used theta=arcsine (.92m/27m) = 1.95 Degrees.

I don’t know the answer but I think that I did everything correctly. Can anyone find a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me!

You might want to give the final answer to 2 sig figs though.

Good job.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top