How the heck are you supposed to use FFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Focus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fft
Focus
Messages
285
Reaction score
3
Hey,

This may seem very stupid but how the heck are you supposed to use FFT? The FFT transformations take a vector as in input but I want to use it to work out FT of a perticular value. I have the charecteristic function of a distribution and wish to numericaly work out values for the distribution function. Hope this makes sense.

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


The FT gives the complex spectrum of the input signal, the FFT gives the discrete complex spectrum of an input sequence or vector. In other words, it decomposes the input into frequency components. I don't follow how you intend to apply this to distributions.
 


The Fourier transform itself is a transform of a function not a number. The FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) thinks of the function as being given by a discrete "vector" of values at different points. I have no idea what you could mean by taking the FFT of a single value.
 


Sorry maybe I was not so clear on this. I have a function
\psi(\lambda)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{i \lambda t}f(t) dt

I was wondering if you could tell me how I could use the FFT (i.e. what values I should sample) to obtain f(\alpha) for some \alpha I choose?

Thanks
 


EDIT: I couldn't get equations in this post to render properly, please see the next.
 
Last edited:


So you know \psi(\lambda) and want to find f(\alpha), which is given by the continuous inverse FT or IFT
f(\alpha)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-i \lambda \alpha}\psi(\lambda) d\lambda

You want to know how to evaluate this using the FFT, right? This is a classic problem in digital signal processing, and the approach depends on the nature of f and psi.

A) f(t) is "bandlimited", that is, it is zero for t > t_c where t_c is a "cutoff time." (Because you are doing an IFT, the usual conventions of sampling a time function to find frequency are swapped here--you are sampling a spectrum to find a time function). An example is f(t)=gaussian, which is effectively zero after 5 standard deviations in time. This is the cutoff time t_c. Psi is also limited in frequency, after, say 5\sigma. So you sample psi uniformly over the interval
|\lambda| \leq 5\sigma, at a rate \Delta\lambda that satisfies the sampling theorem

\Delta\lambda \geq \frac{2}{t_c}.

Use a number of points N that is a power of 2 if you want to use an FFT, otherwise compute with the DFT, and take the value closest to \alpha.

B) If you are not bandlimited, you will alias and your results will suffer in accuracy. We won't discuss this unless it's necessary.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top