How the radioactive decay depends on total mass of the element?

AI Thread Summary
Radioactive decay is independent of the total mass of the element, as atoms decay independently without requiring contact with one another. When decay occurs independently, it follows a simple probability rule. The environment can influence decay rates, as seen with beryllium-7, which has a half-life of 53 days and can have its lifetime altered by different conditions or crystal lattices. Thus, while mass does not affect decay, external factors can have a slight impact on the decay process. Overall, the fundamental nature of radioactive decay remains consistent across different atomic environments.
sanjibghosh
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
how the decay depends on total mass of the radioactive element?
is it necessary that all the atoms of the element keep contact among them, for the above case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sanjibghosh! :smile:

If there's no chain reaction, then the atoms decay independently, and so it doesn't matter where the individual atoms are :wink:
 
ok ,when the atoms decay independently then they follow simple probability rule (?).
 
sanjibghosh said:
ok ,when the atoms decay independently then they follow simple probability rule (?).

yes :smile:
 
thank you 'tiny-tim'
 
In the case of beryllium 7 (proton rich nucleus), which decays by the capture of an atomic electron from the K-shell (53 day half life), the lifetime can be changed slightly by putting it in different environments. or by putting it in a crystal lattice.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top