How there is no work done on a book while i am holding it and moving ?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yomna2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Work Work done
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
14 replies · 23K views
yomna2013
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i still don't really get how there is no work done on a book for example when am holding it and moving ?! i am a 9th grade student and when i ask this weird physics teacher of mine she keeps telling me that when i am holding the book it becomes a part of my body O__o i am not convinced at all i think that work is done on the book as it moves with me ! :)

so ... any help ?!
 
on Phys.org
yomna2013 said:
i still don't really get how there is no work done on a book for example when am holding it and moving ?! i am a 9th grade student and when i ask this weird physics teacher of mine she keeps telling me that when i am holding the book it becomes a part of my body O__o i am not convinced at all i think that work is done on the book as it moves with me ! :)

so ... any help ?!
To do mechanical work on something you must be exerting a force in the direction of your motion. When you are holding a book, the force you exert is upwards (to support its weight). But when you walk you are moving horizontally, so no work is done on the book.

There's certainly biological effort involved in getting your muscles to exert that force. But you are not doing any mechanical work on the book.

If you lift the book upwards, instead of just holding it at the same height, then you'll be doing work on the book.
 
In addition to what Doc Al said, if you climb stairs with the book, they you are doing work on it (AND on your body --- this is the same as what he said about lifting it upwards, I just want to be sure you see that it's a different situation than just "moving with your body" in a horizontal plane)
 
well ... that made things clear enough
thank u :)
 
It sounds as if while you are holding the book motionless relative to yourself, no work is being done on the book. If you are moving the book relative to yourself, it is. For example, if the book is in your hand and your arm (not the other one, of course...) is swinging while you walk, is work then being done on the book?
 
Doc Al said:
To do mechanical work on something you must be exerting a force in the direction of your motion. When you are holding a book, the force you exert is upwards (to support its weight). But when you walk you are moving horizontally, so no work is done on the book.

If I were a teacher and asked the question, "If you hold a book with your palms facing up and the book on top while walking forward, are you doing work on the book?"

I would accept the answer yes if the student mentioned the friction between your hands and the book. If they responded along the lines, "since the friction between your hands and the book is in the direction of motion, yes you are doing work on the book" that would be full credit.

If yomna2013 felt that the act of holding the book was doing work (which is a common misunderstanding) that would be unquestionable wrong. But I do see some fuzziness depending on the exact phrasing of the question. If you view it as friction does the work, but I provide the friction (and slightly push forward), that's fine.
 
But work IS being done on the book? I would have thought that by swinging the book, the muscles of the arm would be doing work on the book?

russ_watters said:
No. Your arms act like a pendulum in that case and gravity does work against the book, then the book does work against gravity and so on and so forth.
 
Over My Head said:
If you are moving the book relative to yourself...
Work in general is relative. When you are standing on the ground and holding a book still, you are doing no work on the book in your frame. In the frame of someone in an moving elevator, you are doing work on the book, or the book on you.
 
DrewD said:
If I were a teacher and asked the question, "If you hold a book with your palms facing up and the book on top while walking forward, are you doing work on the book?"

I would accept the answer yes if the student mentioned the friction between your hands and the book. If they responded along the lines, "since the friction between your hands and the book is in the direction of motion, yes you are doing work on the book" that would be full credit.
Good point. But work would only be done horizontally while you were accelerating. Once you achieved a constant walking speed, no more work is done. So you could walk for miles at that constant pace and yet be doing no work.

If the student explained all that, and explained why no work was done against gravity, they'd get extra credit!
 
The answer to this question depends totally on how 'idea' your model is. The definition of Work Done on the book requires it to change its height (PE) or speed (KE). So, if it is moving uniformly in a horizontal direction and there is no 'Force times Distance' involved, then no work is done 'on' it. This has nothing to do with the work done, internally, by the muscles of your body. A lot of 'Forces times Distances' are involved inside you.
The operation has Zero Efficiency, in fact: Work in but no useful work out.
 
Doc Al said:
But work would only be done horizontally while you were accelerating. Once you achieved a constant walking speed, no more work is done...

But... but... Mr. Teacher, what about the air resistance of the book. Even at constant speed your hand has to do positive work on the book, because the air is doing negative work...
 
A.T. said:
But... but... Mr. Teacher, what about the air resistance of the book. Even at constant speed your hand has to do positive work on the book, because the air is doing negative work...

It all depends upon how 'ideal' your model is. Define that perfectly, from the start, and you will get the best answer. There will always be 'loopholes' if the goalposts are changed.
 
Over My Head said:
But work IS being done on the book? I would have thought that by swinging the book, the muscles of the arm would be doing work on the book?
Your arms essentially swing by themselves when you walk. That's why your legs get tired but your arms don't.
 
A.T. said:
But... but... Mr. Teacher, what about the air resistance of the book. Even at constant speed your hand has to do positive work on the book, because the air is doing negative work...
:smile:

OK, extra credit for you too!
 

Similar threads

High School How Is Energy Expended When Holding a Bucket Stationary?
  • houlahound
  • · Replies 6 ·
  • Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
1K
How do I determine the work done by an ice cube?
  • vitaly
  • · Replies 11 ·
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K