How thick should stainless steel be to increase magnet strength?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gauss20000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stainless steel Steel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of placing stainless steel behind magnets, specifically focusing on how this configuration influences the strength of the magnetic field. Participants explore the types of stainless steel, their magnetic properties, and the implications for applications involving magnets and ferromagnetic materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the magnetic flux density (B) can significantly increase when stainless steel is placed behind a magnet, but this measurement is influenced by various factors including distance and measurement techniques.
  • It is mentioned that there are two types of stainless steel: austenitic (non-magnetic) and martensitic (magnetic), with martensitic stainless steel being effective in reducing magnetic reluctance and increasing the magnetic field.
  • One participant questions how the magnetic flux increases when using martensitic stainless steel and discusses the construction of a pyramid with magnets, suggesting that ferromagnetic stainless steel on the outside could enhance the magnetic field.
  • There is a query about whether a layer of copper between the magnet and stainless steel would be more effective than having the stainless steel directly behind the magnet.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of magnetic flux increase being dependent on the size of the stainless steel used, with some participants suggesting that larger sheets could yield greater increases in flux.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for formulas and explanations regarding the thickness of steel needed to avoid saturation while increasing the magnetic field strength of a specific magnet type.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between the area of the magnet and the required thickness of the steel, with calculations provided for determining the appropriate thickness based on the magnet's dimensions.
  • One participant highlights the importance of understanding steel grades when ordering materials for custom jobs aimed at enhancing magnet strength.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the effectiveness of different configurations and materials, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the optimal thickness of stainless steel or the best configuration for enhancing magnetic strength.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the concept of magnetic reluctance and its impact on magnetic field strength, but there are unresolved questions regarding the exact relationship between the size of the stainless steel and the increase in magnetic flux. Additionally, there are references to specific steel grades and their properties without a definitive conclusion on the best choice for increasing magnet strength.

Gauss20000
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why does the magnetic field increase significantly when stainless steel is placed behind a magnet?

"B (flux density): This is the measurement (in Gauss or Tesla) you get when you use a gaussmeter at the surface of a magnet. The reading is completely dependent on the distance from the surface, the shape of the magnet, the exact location measured, the thickness of the probe and of the magnet's plating. Steel behind a magnet will increase the measured 'B' significantly. Not a very good way to compare magnets, since B varies so much depending on measurement techniques."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two types of stainless steel; austenetic (300 series, non-magnetic) and martensitic (400 series, magnetic). Putting martensitic stainless steel (or any ferromagnetic material) behind a pole will reduce the reluctance of the magnetic circuit, and increase the magnetic field.

Bob S
 
Thank you for your reply Bob S.

I'm curious as to how and why the magnetic flux increases for a magnet when you place martensitic stainless steel (or ferromagnetic material) behind one of its poles. I am building a form of pyramid out of copper and am placing magnets in the apexes. It is my understanding that if I put ferromagnetic stainless steel on the outside of the apexes, this will increase the magnetic field of the magnets.

What would be stronger - magnet with a layer of copper and then the stainless steel; or the magnet with the stainless steel directly behind it so the magnet is stuck to the stainless steel?

And secondly, the increase in magnetic flux will be limited to the size of the stainless steel. So the larger the sheet of stainless steel the greater the increase in flux. Is this right?

Does this mean when I stick a simple magnet to my fridge, the magnetic flux of the magnet is immediately increased?
 
Gauss20000 said:
I'm curious as to how and why the magnetic flux increases for a magnet when you place martensitic stainless steel (or ferromagnetic material) behind one of its poles. I am building a form of pyramid out of copper and am placing magnets in the apexes. It is my understanding that if I put ferromagnetic stainless steel on the outside of the apexes, this will increase the magnetic field of the magnets.
The magnetic steel will either shield or increase the magnetic field, depending on where the measurement is being made.

What would be stronger - magnet with a layer of copper and then the stainless steel; or the magnet with the stainless steel directly behind it so the magnet is stuck to the stainless steel?
See discussion of reluctance and stored energy here:
http://www.femm.info/wiki/Analogies
See definition of reluctance here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_reluctance
If you have a permanent magnet (horseshoe magnet) with a well-defined air gap, and you bring up a piece of steel to it,you reduce the air gap, decrease the reluctance, and decrease the stored energy. This increases the B field in the remaining gap.
And secondly, the increase in magnetic flux will be limited to the size of the stainless steel. So the larger the sheet of stainless steel the greater the increase in flux. Is this right?
There often is no direct relation to the size of piece of steel.

Does this mean when I stick a simple magnet to my fridge, the magnetic flux of the magnet is immediately increased?
If the magnet is pulled to the fridge, the B field close of the magnet is increased.
Bob S
 
Last edited:
I would like to know a couple of formulas (and simple explanation) of this topic. I am about to have some steel work done, but I need to squeeze a little more B from my magnets. If I want to increase the B of a circular 1"dia 1/8" thick N48 magnet, I would expect to place magnetic steel behind the magnet. I would expect to shield the B on the side I placed the steel, and increase the stregnth of B on the opposite side. How do I know how thick the steel needs to be without being saturated? What kind of increase can I expect?

Also, I know nothing of steel numbers or grades. When ordering, what is the cheapest and also most effective steel for increasing magnet stregnth? This will be a custom job, and I need to know the lingo...

Thanks in advance.
 
keith03 said:
. If I want to increase the B of a circular 1"dia 1/8" thick N48 magnet, I would expect to place magnetic steel behind the magnet. I would expect to shield the B on the side I placed the steel, and increase the stregnth of B on the opposite side. How do I know how thick the steel needs to be without being saturated? What kind of increase can I expect?.
The first question is easily answered. The area of the N48 magnet is pi R2, where R = 0.5". because the B field is continuous, the steel plate must carry the same flux (B-field times area) as the magnet itself. Soft iron saturates about at 1.2 Tesla, similar to the field from N48. At a radius R = 0.5" on the steel, the circumference times the thickness (2 pi R t) should be the same area as the magnet itself, because the flux in the steel is entirely radial. So we get

2 pi R t = pi R2, or t= R/2 = 1/4" thick.

Look at attached thumbnail of iron and stainless permeabilities. Pure iron followed by 1018 steel are much better than the two 400-series stainless steels shown.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • Iron_permeability4.jpg
    Iron_permeability4.jpg
    56.8 KB · Views: 530

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K