How Thick Should the Film Be for Strong Reflection at 610 nm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter astru025
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Physics
AI Thread Summary
To achieve strong reflection for 610 nm light when coating a glass lens with a film of higher refractive index, the film thickness must be carefully calculated. The wavelength in the film is determined by dividing the wavelength in a vacuum by the film's refractive index. The discussion highlights uncertainty regarding the correct initial film thickness and the relationship between the refractive indices of the materials involved. Participants emphasize the need to understand the conditions for strong reflection, suggesting that the refractive indices may not be the only factors at play. Ultimately, a deeper exploration of the interference effects caused by varying film thickness is necessary to find the correct solution.
astru025
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

You are coating a glass lens of index of refraction 1.6 with a film of material of index of refraction 1.7. You start with the thinnest film possible that creates a strong reflection for 610 nm light. You gradually increase the film thickness until you again get strong reflection. What is the thickness of the film now?

2. Homework Equations

Wavelength in film = wavelength in a vacuum / index of refraction of film

610 nm / 1.6 = my answer? Not sure if this is correct.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Just need to be pointed in the right direction! Really am not sure where to start for this problem. Any help would be really nice!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
astru025 said:
1. Homework Statement

You are coating a glass lens of index of refraction 1.6 with a film of material of index of refraction 1.7. You start with the thinnest film possible that creates a strong reflection for 610 nm light. You gradually increase the film thickness until you again get strong reflection. What is the thickness of the film now?

2. Homework Equations

Wavelength in film = wavelength in a vacuum / index of refraction of film

610 nm / 1.6 = my answer? Not sure if this is correct.
Probably not.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Just need to be pointed in the right direction! Really am not sure where to start for this problem. Any help would be really nice!
It's fairly obvious you're just guessing. I mean, how do you know the answer isn't 610 nm/1.7? Or maybe it's some combination of 1.6 and 1.7. Or maybe it has absolutely nothing to do with the indexes of refraction. Why do you think it does? (It could be the information is superfluous.)

Think about what's going on here. What's happening when get a strong reflection?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top