How to analyze heat transfer effects of viscoelastic fluids

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the heat transfer analysis of viscoelastic fluids, specifically criticizing the use of Prandtl numbers derived from air and water, which are not viscoelastic. Participants highlight the need for accurate examples of viscoelastic fluids and their corresponding Prandtl numbers, emphasizing that Prandtl numbers are only one of many properties for fluid characterization. The Oldroyd B fluid model is mentioned as inadequate for accurately describing real viscoelastic fluids due to its constant viscosity assumption, which does not reflect the shear viscosity variation in practical scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Prandtl number and its significance in heat transfer analysis.
  • Knowledge of viscoelastic fluid properties and behavior.
  • Familiarity with the Oldroyd B fluid model and its limitations.
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics, particularly in circular pipe flow.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research specific viscoelastic fluids and their Prandtl numbers, such as Polyethylene oxide and Glycerol.
  • Study the velocity profile of viscoelastic fluids in circular pipes under varying temperature conditions.
  • Examine alternative viscoelastic fluid models that better represent real-world behavior.
  • Explore the implications of shear viscosity variation on heat transfer in viscoelastic fluids.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and students in fluid dynamics, particularly those focusing on heat transfer in viscoelastic fluids and their applications in engineering systems.

Idrees Afridi
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
n the heat transfer analysis of boundary layer flow of viscoelastic fluids many researchers see the variation of temperature of fluid inside the boundary layer with Prandtl number, for which they use prandtl number 0.7, 2 , 3, 4 ..
This is what generally the researchers do..
Currently i am thinking that , such a analysis is wrong because the Prandtl number they use are of air and water and both fluids are not viscoelastic ..
Secondly , i need some examples of viscoelastic fluids with the correspoding values of Prandtl number.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Different fluids can have the same Prandtl number. It is only one of many properties used to characterize a fluid. It's not only air that is around 0.7, for example, but many gases.
 
But gasses are also not viscoelastic fluids then why they are using Prandtl number of gasses .
 
boneh3ad.. kindly give me some examples of viscoelastic fuids with Prandtl numbers..
 
I'm not much of a viscoelastic fluid expert, I'm afraid. I'm simply trying to point out that just because air has a Prandtl number of 0.7 doesn't mean that another fluid can't.
 
Before you start looking at complicated situations like boundary layer flow, I suggest you first look at heat transfer in steady state flow of viscoelastic fluid in a simple situation like a circular pipe. Assume that a certain location along the pipe, the pipe wall temperature suddenly changes from ##T_0## to ##T_1##. Before even considering the development of a temperature profile, do you know how to determine the velocity profile of a viscoelastic fluid in the pipe as a function of radial position.? If you can't work this problem, you will not be able to get a handle on what viscosity to use in calculating the Prantdl number, or what the Prantdl number should be.
 
Chestermiller said:
Before you start looking at complicated situations like boundary layer flow, I suggest you first look at heat transfer in steady state flow of viscoelastic fluid in a simple situation like a circular pipe. Assume that a certain location along the pipe, the pipe wall temperature suddenly changes from ##T_0## to ##T_1##. Before even considering the development of a temperature profile, do you know how to determine the velocity profile of a viscoelastic fluid in the pipe as a function of radial position.? If you can't work this problem, you will not be able to get a handle on what viscosity to use in calculating the Prantdl number, or what the Prantdl number should be.
Greetings:
the heat transfer analysis of viscoelastic fluid in a circular duct or curved circular duct has been investigated by many researchers and they are taking different Prandtl number without any justification. kindly check the link below and specially see the fig 3 in which the author mention that Pr=0.85
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00231-010-0641-3
 
why the researchers are taking Prandtl number of gases and water during the heat transfer analysis of viscoelastic fluids ?
 
Idrees Afridi said:
why the researchers are taking Prandtl number of gases and water during the heat transfer analysis of viscoelastic fluids ?
The Oldroyd B fluid does not describe the behavior of any real viscoelastic fluids. It is a "viscoelastic fluid model" which exhibits certain qualitative features of real viscoelastic fluids, but can not describe the mechanical behavior of these fluids quantitatively. One of the qualitative features it does not describe correctly is the variation of the shear viscosity with shear rate. So, rather than the shear viscosity being a function of the radial velocity gradient, the Oldroyd B fluid predicts a constant value for the viscosity. In this case, it is possible to define a Prantdl number for the fluid based on a single unique viscosity parameter. The value this has in describing real-world heat transfer behavior of real viscoelastic fluid is, to say the least, highly questionable.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K