I How to approach a more perfect blackbody?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how an object like the Sun can approach a more perfect blackbody, defined as an ideal emitter and absorber of radiation in thermal equilibrium. Participants question whether increasing the Sun's density would enhance its blackbody characteristics and discuss the implications of emission lines and continuous spectra. It is suggested that isolating the Sun in a highly insulated environment could help achieve thermal equilibrium, making it more blackbody-like. The conversation also considers the effects of modifying the Sun's photosphere and density on its temperature and emission properties. Ultimately, the complexity of achieving a perfect blackbody state in celestial bodies remains a key point of inquiry.
Ron19932017
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
I wonder how an object, like our sun, can approach a more perfect blackbody.
We know that by the wiki definition, blackbody is something that absorb all radiation and is in thermal equilibrium. Its spectrum only depends on T.

We also know that, our Sun's spectrum is blackbody like, while a galaxy/nebula's spectrum is not. I heard explanations like we require the gas to be dense to be a blackbody. That's where my confusion comes.

1.) Suppose our sun is twice denser, does that means it more blackbody-like? and why?
2.) Except from the emission/absorption line, our Sun's continuous spectrum is offset from a perfect blackbody. Is this discrepency due to the density of the Sun not high enough?
3.) Does hot diffuse gas have emission lines, plus a non-blackbody-like continuous spectrum? I wonder how one can calculate that non-blackbody-like continuous spectrum, assuming the diffuse gas is in thermal equalibrium.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are missing the point that an "ideal" blackbody doesn't reflect or emit any light except for "blackbody" radiation due to temperature.
Ron19932017 said:
I wonder how an object, like our sun, can approach a more perfect blackbody.
By putting it in a highly insulated box, shutting down all nuclear reactions, et cetera, anything that brings it closer to thermal equilibrium.
 
jerromyjon said:
I think you are missing the point that an "ideal" blackbody doesn't reflect or emit any light except for "blackbody" radiation due to temperature.

By putting it in a highly insulated box, shutting down all nuclear reactions, et cetera, anything that brings it closer to thermal equilibrium.
Yes, you are right. Our Sun is not blackbody-like in the fusion site, but it is blackbody like at the surface.
Maybe I should address the question like this: How can we modify the photosphere to make it a better blackbody? Can we do it by increasing the density, and why?
 
Ron19932017 said:
How can we modify the photosphere to make it a better blackbody? Can we do it by increasing the density, and why?
What do you think would happen to the blackbody emissions if you increased the density? Would the temperature change?
 
jerromyjon said:
What do you think would happen to the blackbody emissions if you increased the density? Would the temperature change?
Thanks for your reply. If we put gases directly on the surface of the Sun we increases the Sun's pressure so it will be hotter.

However I think we can still just imagine a situation that, the surface shell is departed from the fusion core, like the gas sit in a shell-shaped container and are being heated from central sunlight. Therefore these gas in the shell absorbs inner radiation, and re-emit them by thermal radiation. In that case we should be able to talk about changing the density without changing the temperature, although I am not sure how to tune the volume and pressure of the shell of gas..
 
Ron19932017 said:
In that case we should be able to talk about changing the density without changing the temperature, although I am not sure how to tune the volume and pressure of the shell of gas..
I don't have the necessary background to help with that, perhaps someone else can get further into the details...
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top