How to Average Graphs with Different Time Indices?

u-zara
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have 10 sets of data which I have to analyze. The data represents a change in voltage over time and I want to come up with an "average" curve to represent the 10 sets of data. The problem is that the time index for each data is different so I can't simply average the voltage. Is there any method which I can use to solve this problem? I've attached an image of the graph with 3 sets of the data so you understand what I'm dealing with. Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • graph.PNG
    graph.PNG
    12.6 KB · Views: 588
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it you have reason to believe that the three plots are for the same physics?

The time index does not matter - just combine the three plots as a single set of ordered pairs (v,t). The time step ti-ti-1 need not be constant.
 
Thanks for the reply. However I'm not just thinking of combining the graphs. I want a curve which is an average of all the data, for example a single spline curve which represents the data.
 
u-zara said:
Thanks for the reply. However I'm not just thinking of combining the graphs. I want a curve which is an average of all the data, for example a single spline curve which represents the data.

That sounds suspiciously like a regression problem, but approaching it that way is going to be a little complicated (e.g. the errors are clearly not normally distributed).
 
Yeah - it's very skewed.
u-zara said:
Is there any method which I can use to solve this problem?
... and what problem was that?
The problem is that the time index for each data is different so I can't simply average the voltage.
... that's right, you need to use a weighted average.

As Number-Nine says, this is a regression problem with non-normal statistics.
You can, however, use the physics of the situation to guide the shape of the regressed curve - and then you have to decide what sort of regression you will be happy with.

Of course, you can just make a guess to the curve and adjust the parameters by eye until you get something reasonable. The human visual system is quite good at this sort of thing but you may have to be more rigorous than that.
 
It's a bit hard to tell from the fog of datapoints, but it looks to me that the time axis problem is worse than merely having different sample instants; some of the datasets look stretched in time relative to others. Is that what you meant when you said the time index was different?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top