How to avoid feeling frustrated when facing with so much unkown knowledge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arielleon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Knowledge
AI Thread Summary
Navigating research topics in theoretical condensed matter physics can be overwhelming for undergraduate students, leading to frustration when faced with complex concepts like Berry phase or Higgs mechanism. Many students experience a common struggle of feeling lost in extensive materials and abstract terminology, especially early in their academic careers. While this feeling may diminish with experience, the challenge of assumed knowledge in academic writing can hinder understanding. A potential solution proposed is the inclusion of a "student prompter" section in academic journals to guide newcomers to relevant resources. Engaging with supervisors for targeted reading suggestions is recommended to help bridge the knowledge gap.
arielleon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am now a third grade undergraduate student. I do fair job in my studies. Now I have been in a theorectical condensed matter group in my university to learn how to do researches. But after a whole year, I still find that when I want to run into a topic, say Berry phase, or higgs mechanism, I always dig out endless materials. Sometimes I learn much. But in many case, I find myself lost in some "forbbidden" knowledge forrest and pay a lot of time but get to know nothing except some abstract terminologies. As this happens again and again, I feel really frustrated when facing something new. So I want to ask: Is doing research really that hard? Then how do physicists get into the field and seldomly feel bad? Thx a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to view the fact that there's always something more to learn as a negative. Good researchers view it as a positive.
 
fss said:
You seem to view the fact that there's always something more to learn as a negative. Good researchers view it as a positive.

I love to learn new things. But I hate to be lost in new things. It seems that I spend a lot of time and learn little. And I wonder if this is a common thing or not when doing research.
 
I'd say it's pretty common for a student - less so once you've been actively researching in a field for a decade.

In any academic writing there is a lot of assumed knowledge. If you don't begin with the premise that your audience has a basic understanding of your field, you'll end up writing a textbook in order to convey the small contribution to the field that you've made - which is incredibly inefficient.

One solution to the problem might be for journals to require a "student prompter" section in each of their puplished manuscripts, where the authors could point to various review articles or textbook chapters relevant to their work, but I don't see that happening any time soon. Thus you're stuck with approaching your supervisor and asking him or her for suggestions on material to cover so that you can better understand the papers you're going through.
 
I don't know if anyone on here works for any of the well known defense companies of your country, whichever country you are from?? Also, if you choose to work in one, do you think the engineering education provide from your school would adequately prepare you for the job. What do I mean by that? Well if you work at say Lockheed Martin and you work in the latest iteration of a missile or if you work at Pratt & Whitney, they assign you to work in the team helping out with building the jet...
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...
Back
Top