How to calc human bicycle power in watts

AI Thread Summary
To calculate Lance Armstrong's power output while cycling at 30 mph for 125 miles on level ground, one must consider the resistive forces such as friction and wind resistance, which impact energy consumption. The discussion highlights the need for specific equations to quantify these forces, as the initial information provided may be insufficient for accurate calculations. It is noted that maintaining a constant speed on a flat surface theoretically requires no energy, but practical scenarios involve various resistive factors. Additionally, there is a question regarding Armstrong's weight, suggesting a potential oversight in the initial parameters. Accurate calculations will require further details on resistive forces and possibly adjustments to the weight assumption.
Dyllon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How to calculate Lance Armstrongs power output/calorie consumption at 30 mph, 125 miles on level ground , no wind, 157 lbs plus 16lb bike?


Homework Equations

What equations do I use?



The Attempt at a Solution


I'm 14 years old, where do I start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think there's enough information given to do the calculation. The energy used will be a function of the resistive forces that have to be overcome by the cyclist. In an ideal world, traveling at constant speed on a flat track uses no energy, but in reality there's friction and wind resistance and other things also.

Doesn't Lance Armstrong weigh more that 157 lbs ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top