How to calculate a centrifugal pump for a jet boat.

AI Thread Summary
Building a jet boat requires careful consideration of the impeller dimensions to optimize engine performance without overloading. The project involves a power source of approximately 90 hp at 3600 rpm and 130 ft-lb of torque, with specific input and output dimensions for the impeller and nozzle. Calculating the ideal impeller diameter and rpm is complex, often blending art and science, and may require advanced fluid dynamics knowledge. It is suggested that purchasing a pre-made impeller designed for similar power levels might be a more practical solution. Access to resources, such as books on waterjet propulsion, can provide additional insights into the design process.
beef supreme
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am building a jet boat as a project this year. I am going construct the impeller my self but don't know what dimensions I need to make it to get the most out of the engines without over loading them. Here's what I have to work with:

The power source is going to be approximately 90 hp at 3600 rpm with about 130 ft-lb of torque. That power is going to be transmitted by two B section v-belts and pulleys. What I'm trying to accomplish is to get as close to 90 hp out of a water jet as possible. I can do about 50 square inches at the input and output of the impeller and a nozzle of about 12.5 square inches at the rear of the boat. My question is what diameter do I want to make the impeller assuming the circumference times the height of the opening at the edge is equal to the intake (50 inches^2) and what rpm?

Any insight on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to go find a jet boat forum. I suspect optimising the prop to match the boat is as much a black art as a science.
 
I really need someone who has a good general knowledge of fluid dynamics and such who can perhaps give me a formula to figure how to achieve the maximum gross thrust with the 90ish horsepower input.
People on boat forums, in my experiences, generally haven't known much about the physics surrounding these things.
 
Honestly, I think you'd be best off buying a premade impeller designed for about your level of power input. This is far from a trivial calculation, and as CWatters said, is probably as much a black art as it is a science (unless you have access to an advanced CFD program and a supercomputer, as well as a fair amount of time to figure out how to run it).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top