How to calculate a simple rate of return

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobbo7410
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate
AI Thread Summary
To calculate a simple rate of return, the discussion highlights an example where a $1,000 investment yields $150 annually for five years, with a salvage value of $1,000, resulting in a 15% annual return. Confusion arises when a second example shows a $2,000 investment returning $150 per year for six years, with a salvage value of $2,700, yielding an 11.8% return. The participants struggle with incorporating salvage value into their calculations and understanding the differing rates of return. Additionally, they note that the overall return includes both the annual income and the increase in salvage value. Clarifying these calculations is essential for accurately determining the rate of return.
bobbo7410
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I'm reading an example in the book, and I simply can't wrap my mind around it...

It's claiming you invest $1000 and get back $150 per year for 5 years. At the end of 5 years the salvage value is $1000 (if that matters).

It claims the Rate of Return is 15%, yet for the life of me I can't figure out where they got that 15%...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
They mean 15% a year, not overall.
 
JonF said:
They mean 15% a year, not overall.

I thought that originally... yet the next one shows investing $2000, and $150 year for 6 years (salvage value of 2700). The rate of return is shown at 11.8%, which throws off my initial logic... hence my confusion.

I'm not sure how to implement the salvage value, etc.
 
bobbo7410 said:
I thought that originally... yet the next one shows investing $2000, and $150 year for 6 years (salvage value of 2700). The rate of return is shown at 11.8%, which throws off my initial logic... hence my confusion.

You get 7.5% per year, but you also turn $2000 into $2700 over 6 years, which is itself something like a 5% yearly return.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top