How to calculate Clebsch-Gordon coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avijeet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficients
Avijeet
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Can anybody tell me how to calculate Clebsch-Gordon coefficients?
I see a table given for the coefficients in some books (Griffiths p200), but it is not clear how to read the table.
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avijeet said:
Can anybody tell me how to calculate Clebsch-Gordon coefficients?
I see a table given for the coefficients in some books (Griffiths p200), but it is not clear how to read the table.
Any help would be appreciated.

Well, I never use the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients directly in calculations ... I use Wigner 3-j symbols instead.(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-jm_symbol) The CG coeffs are useful because they are directly related to the angular momentum coupling equations, but the Wigner symbols are much more intuitive to use in calculations, and have useful symmetry properties as well. I am not going to give a detailed re-hashing of the CG coeffs here ... the treatment in Griffiths is good .. you could also try Zare's "Angular Momentum", which gives a more thorough description IMO. If you have specific questions, please ask them .. in the meantime I can give the following descriptive summaries that may prove helpful.

CG coeffs are the scalar products of the description between the uncoupled and coupled representations for two angular momentum vectors j1 and j2. In usual notation, <j_1m_1j_2m_2|j_1j_2JM>, the uncoupled representation is on the left, where the z-projections of the two angular momenta are considered separately. The coupled representation is on the right, where the two angular momenta are first added together to give total angular momentum (J), and it's projection on the z-axis (M). Remember there are multiple ways that two angular momenta can be added ... that is the reason we need the CG coefficients in the first place.

The formula for calculating a CG coefficient can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_Clebsch-Gordan_coefficients#Formulation.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top