How to calculate increase in kinetic energy due to acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the increase in kinetic energy due to acceleration for a solid cylinder, the formula used is the change in kinetic energy, represented as 0.5I(ω_final^2 - ω_initial^2). The moment of inertia (I) for a cylinder is given by 0.5M(R^2). In this case, with a mass of 120 kg and a radius of 0.3 m, the calculation yields a change in kinetic energy of approximately 56851 Joules. The approach of subtracting the initial kinetic energy from the final kinetic energy is confirmed to be correct. Thus, the calculations provided align with the physics principles involved.
ingram010
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Hope some one can help with this

Calculate the increase in kinetic energy due to acceleration?

0.6m diameter Solid cylinder with a mass of 120kg, initial velocity of 20.94 rad/s and final velocity of 146.61 rad/s.

I have found an equation for the kinetic energy lost at impact:-

1/2 moment of inertia x initial velocity^2 + 1/2 moment of inertia x final velocity^2

My question is, am I right in thinking it is the same equation but I subtract one from the other in stead of adding them?

so

I = 1/2 mass x radius ^2

1/2 (5.4)(146.61)^2 - 1/2 (5.4)(20.94)^2 = 56851 Joules


Kindest regards

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the cylinder is undergoing pure rotation, K = 0.5I(omega^2)
The change in kinetic energy is then 0.5I(omegafinal^2-omegainitial^2)
For a cylinder, I = 0.5M(R^2)
So (deltaK) = 0.25M(R^2)(omegafinal^2-omegainitial^2)
= 0.25(120)(0.3^2)(146.61^2-20.94^2) = 56851.22295J
So your answer is correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top