How to Calculate Initial Velocity in a Same Direction Crash Without Tire Marks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Colm2243
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crash
AI Thread Summary
To find the initial velocity of a vehicle involved in a same-direction crash without tire marks or braking, the principle of conservation of momentum is essential. The momentum before and after the collision can be expressed using the formula: m_A(before) * v_A(before) + m_B(before) * v_B(before) = m_A(after) * v_A(after) + m_B(after) * v_B(after). If the pre-collision velocities are unknown, additional data such as the post-collision behavior, like the distance traveled after separation, can help estimate the initial velocities. The discussion also touches on the relevance of translation symmetry and momentum in non-relativistic physics. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the initial conditions of the vehicles involved in the crash.
Colm2243
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What formula(s) would I use to find the initial velocity of a vehicle that has impacted a second vehicle in a same direction crash. There are no tire marks on the roadway and no braking involved. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In physics, there is something called translation symmetry, meaning that the fundamental properties of the Universe does not depend on where you are. Out of this symmetry, a phenomena known as momentum arises. In non-relativistic velocities, this is a good approximation.

From your post, I assume that the first car (called car A) hits the second car (car B) from behind. No matter if some kinetic energy is converted to heat energy via friction, the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum of car B before the impact is the same as the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum for car B after the impact.

m_{A(before)} v_{A(before)} ~+~ m_{B(before)}v_{B(before)}~ = m_{A(after)} v_{A(after)} ~+~ m_{B(after)} v_{B(after)}

Solve for the velocity for A before the crash if you have access to the other values.
 
Last edited:
Moridin said:
In physics, there is something called translation symmetry, meaning that the fundamental properties of the Universe does not depend on where you are. Out of this symmetry, a phenomena known as momentum arises. In non-relativistic velocities, this is a good approximation.

From your post, I assume that the first car (called car A) hits the second car (car B) from behind. No matter if some kinetic energy is converted to heat energy via friction, the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum of car B before the impact is the same as the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum for car B after the impact.

m_{A(before)} v_{A(before)} ~+~ m_{B(before)}v_{B(before)}~ = m_{A(after)} v_{A(after)} ~+~ m_{B(after)} v_{B(after)}

Solve for the velocity for A before the crash if you have access to the other values.
I don't have the values for pre collision velocity on either vehicle. How can I determine this? A wall was impacted after the two vehicles became stuck together and after impact with the wall vehicle two separated and rolled over and skid to a stop 40 feet after separation on it' s roof.
 
Moridin said:
In non-relativistic velocities, this is a good approximation.
Translation symmetry only exists in the Newtonian limit?!?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top