luuurey
- 24
- 0
Could someone please show me how to calculate the deformation of a pad (ideal material with the same elasticity at all directions) under a cylinder ? Thank you very much.
The discussion revolves around calculating the deformation of a pad under a cylinder, focusing on the mechanics of contact stress and the underlying equations. Participants explore various aspects of the problem, including theoretical foundations, practical applications, and specific equations related to deformation and elasticity.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to calculate pad deformation, with multiple competing views on the interpretation of equations and the necessary steps to derive deformation from stress. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific calculations needed.
Participants express uncertainty about the derivation of specific equations and their application to the problem at hand. There are references to various resources that may not provide direct answers, leading to confusion about the foundational principles involved.
This discussion may be of interest to mechanical engineers, students studying contact mechanics, and individuals involved in material science or structural engineering who seek to understand the complexities of pad deformation under load.
Studiot said:This is a standard contact stress problem where have you looked?
luuurey said:But how does everyone find out this? It looks like everyone just copy this without understanding.
Studiot said:The question is commonly addressed by mechanical engineers (as with my link).
It is also standard stuff in standard books such as Roark or Pilney
If you are interested in the background then post more details of your application and interest.
For example where do we get the equation from Wikipedia?
Studiot said:Sorry to tell you this but you put something into this discussion.
What do you want to know and at what level?
Studiot said:What was wrong with the link I offered?
The Wiki formula is not the one you want directly.
Do you understand what the symbols mean in it?
cronanster said:As Studiot has pointed out, what you are looking for is in that link. No, it doesn't go line by line on the derivation, but you should be able to work backwards to see where it came from.
Read through that link again, all pages, and if you still don't understand, come bak and ask.