How to calculate quadrotor propeller torque due to aerodynamic drag

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the torque of a quadrotor propeller due to aerodynamic drag, specifically using the APC 10x4.7 propeller data. Participants emphasize the importance of developing a non-linear thrust model that incorporates thrust, RPM, and throttle, rather than focusing solely on torque. A formula for thrust is provided, which relates thrust to propeller diameter and RPM, suggesting the use of a lookup table for efficiency. The conversation also highlights that quadrotor designs typically feature counter-rotating props to self-compensate for reaction torques, making torque calculations less critical for most maneuvers. Overall, the thread concludes with the acknowledgment of the complexities involved in modeling propeller dynamics for simulations.
marcin123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'd like to know the right formula to calculate torque of a quadrotor propeller (propeller pitch is constant) due to aerodynamic drag in terms of angular velocity ω. For the sake of my simulation I'm assuming `APC 10x4,7` propellers. I'd like to refer to http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-selig/props/propDB.html#APC, so please assume only the set of data given there is available while answering. I know really little of aerodynamics, I'm planning to design a control system in Simulink later on, but would like to derive a non-linear mathematical model first.

Please note I need to use data from http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-selig/props/propDB.html#APC for APC 10x4,7, which means the propeller below. I'm guessing all is there to derive a formula τ(ω), I just don't understand how to do it.

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7838/apcsf10x47side.jpg
http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/7319/apcsf10x47front.jpg
http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/8931/apcsf10x47geom.png

Static data from UIUC:
RPM CT CP
2377 0.1039 0.0431
2676 0.1058 0.0437
2947 0.1059 0.0437
3234 0.1083 0.0444
3494 0.1096 0.0450
3762 0.1121 0.0460
4029 0.1136 0.0466
4319 0.1155 0.0474
4590 0.1177 0.0484
4880 0.1199 0.0494
5147 0.1213 0.0500
5417 0.1228 0.0508
5715 0.1239 0.0513
5960 0.1253 0.0520
6226 0.1261 0.0524
6528 0.1274 0.0531
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
marcin123 said:
I'd like to know the right formula to calculate torque of a quadrotor propeller (propeller pitch is constant) due to aerodynamic drag in terms of angular velocity ω. For the sake of my simulation I'm assuming `APC 10x4,7` propellers. I'd like to refer to http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-selig/props/propDB.html#APC, so please assume only the set of data given there is available while answering. I know really little of aerodynamics, I'm planning to design a control system in Simulink later on, but would like to derive a non-linear mathematical model first.

Let me clarify a few things.

  • You are simulating a quadrotor.
    You want to develop a non-linear Thrust model. Torque isn't particularly useful in your simulation unless you need to know if your motor can spin the prop without overheating.
    Your thrust model consists of a prop - motor combination. A prop alone cannot help you.
    The three variables you should be concerned with are Thrust-RPM-Throttle (or current)

If you want to take a stab at this model you find a motor that will operate at some range of RPMs given on the table and use the formula

C_T = \frac{T}{\rho n^2 D^4}

Where T is thrust, D is the blade diameter, n is RPS (convert to RPM)

Then you can multiply by some efficiency factor \eta ~0.95 or so to account for heat losses etc...

You will probably end up with a lookup table and not a formula
 
Thank you visciousflow. I had some problems with Imperial units, but were able to overcome those and am able to model both thrust and torque in terms of angular velocity now (inserted below, thrust in [g] on the left, torque in [Nm] on the right axis, angular vel. in RPM) with the UIUC data.

http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/1466/apcsf10x47characteristi.png

My goal is to simulate all:
  • dynamic response of a motor together with prop
  • thrust
  • torque

I'll ask a follow-up question when I get there, if I encounter problems. For now the case is solved - thanks all who read and gave a short thought.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quad rotors are usually designed so that the props are counter-rotating and thus, the reaction torques are self compensated (for most maneuvers). For maneuvers that they are not self-compensated, they are negligible. I just completed my thesis and worked with the APC 12x9 prop. Trust me, it would not be worth adding to the simulation. Although, the model would look more complete if you do add them.
 
Can you link me to your thesis razorhash? I would love to read it. It's an interesting topic, I'm also researching something similar.
 
I hope this isn't dragging up an old topic, but I'm currently looking for the governing equations for propellers and the relevant thrust/torque generated. I'm having a nightmare of a time trying to work out the relationship between RPM, pitch, diameter and generated torque/thrust. Could someone help point me in the right direction, please? I've tried asking on various RC plane forums, but their general answer is "50-75W per pound of craft is the minimum". While that's a helpful answer for a hobbyist, I'm working on a MEng project for uni so would really like something more substantial to justify my decisions.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top