B How to calculate the amplification of a cone

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter gary350
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplification Cone
AI Thread Summary
Sound diminishes in volume as it travels away from its source, losing about 50% of its intensity with each doubling of cross-sectional area. A cardboard cone designed for sound collection effectively focuses sound waves, allowing the user to hear distant sounds, such as conversations or birds, that would otherwise be inaudible. The cone's dimensions, with a large end of 13 inches and a small end of 1 inch, suggest a significant increase in sound concentration, although it's unclear if this results in a 169-fold amplification. Historical use of similar cones during WWI and WWII for detecting aircraft highlights their practical applications. While the cone may not amplify sound in the traditional sense, it enhances the listener's ability to hear distant sounds effectively.
gary350
Messages
278
Reaction score
75
TL;DR Summary
How to calculate the amplification of a cone
Some where I read as sound travel away from the source its volume become 50% less every time cross sectional area doubles. Like throwing a rock into the lake wave rings get larger and larger diameter as the wave travel away from the rock. It seems to me same thing should happen in reverse.

I built a cardboard cone it measures 13" square on the big end and 1" square on the small end. Cone is 24" long. When I use cone to listen to TV I can turn volume down so low no one can hear it but me with the cone 15 ft away.

I can hear birds in the trees that I can not hear any other way.

I can year people talking across the street very easy.

I can hear things very far away that can not be heard without the cone.

13x13 = 169 sq in at the big end. 1x1 = 1 sq in at small end. I'm not sure if that is called a sound increase of 169 times or not?

During WWI and early part of WWII they used cones to listen for income airplanes 10 miles away before radar was invented.

Is there a formula to calculate how much louder sound gets using a certain size cone?

I don't think a cone is a true amplifier but it does make sound louder.

100_7060.JPG


82874283_874609329705011_1904182860307234816_o.jpg


102405579_874607973038480_8465303518767480832_n.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top