How to Calculate the Moment of Inertia of a Thin Rod About an Off-Center Axis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreatEscapist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Moment
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia of a thin rod about an off-center axis, the integration must be performed correctly over the entire length of the rod. The density should consistently be represented as M/L, rather than using M/d or M/L-d, which leads to dimensional inaccuracies. The integration should cover the total length from -d to L-d to ensure all mass contributions are accounted for. Participants in the discussion emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the integrals and understanding the physical meaning behind the calculations. Clarifications on the integration process and density representation are essential for arriving at the correct solution.
GreatEscapist
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate by direct integration the moment of inertia for a thin rod of mass M and length L about an axis located distance d from one end.

Homework Equations



I = Ʃmir2i

Which can be rewritten as int (r2)dm as Δm -> 0

Since we cannot integrate over a mass, we need to switch to dx, which is dm = M/L dx

The Attempt at a Solution


The question is asking us to find the moment of inertia as it rotates on an axis d from one end.

Normally, if we are trying to find the moment of inertia of an "infinitely thin" rod rotating on one end, the moment of inertia is (1/3)ML2

However, we have to manually integrate this problem because we have mass on both sides of the axis of rotation.

I took two integrals- one on one side of d, and on the other.

First side:
(M/d) int(x2)dx (with bounds 0 to d)

(M/d)(x3/3) (with bounds 0 to d)

= Md2/3
The second side:
(M/L-d) int(x2) dx (with bounds from d to L)

(M/L-d) (x3/3) (with bounds from d to L)

(M/L-d) ( (L3/3) - (d3/3))Then I added the two moments of inertia together, to get:

(Md2/3) + (M/L-d)((L3/3) - (d3/3))
This answer is not correct, and I was wondering where i went wrong conceptually/mathematically. Homework is due soon, so any immediate help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GreatEscapist said:

Homework Statement


Calculate by direct integration the moment of inertia for a thin rod of mass M and length L about an axis located distance d from one end.


Homework Equations



I = Ʃmir2i

Which can be rewritten as int (r2)dm as Δm -> 0

Since we cannot integrate over a mass, we need to switch to dx, which is dm = M/L dx


The Attempt at a Solution


The question is asking us to find the moment of inertia as it rotates on an axis d from one end.

Normally, if we are trying to find the moment of inertia of an "infinitely thin" rod rotating on one end, the moment of inertia is (1/3)ML2

However, we have to manually integrate this problem because we have mass on both sides of the axis of rotation.

I took two integrals- one on one side of d, and on the other.

First side:
(M/d) int(x2)dx (with bounds 0 to d)

(M/d)(x3/3) (with bounds 0 to d)

= Md2/3



The second side:
(M/L-d) int(x2) dx (with bounds from d to L)

(M/L-d) (x3/3) (with bounds from d to L)

(M/L-d) ( (L3/3) - (d3/3))


Then I added the two moments of inertia together, to get:

(Md2/3) + (M/L-d)((L3/3) - (d3/3))



This answer is not correct, and I was wondering where i went wrong conceptually/mathematically. Homework is due soon, so any immediate help is greatly appreciated.

The density is M/L. Why did you use M/d and M/L -d as density? The second one is even dimensionally wrong.

You should integrate simply from -d to L-d.

ehild
 
I thought you used d and L-d because that was the length over which you were integrating.

It's always just over the total length?
 
GreatEscapist said:
I thought you used d and L-d because that was the length over which you were integrating.

The density of both pieces are the same M/L.

GreatEscapist said:
It's always just over the total length?
You are supposed to get the moment of inertia by direct integration of the square of the distance from the pivot from one end to the other one. You can replace one integral with the sum of other two, but why?

ehild
 

Attachments

  • imom.JPG
    imom.JPG
    3.5 KB · Views: 1,067
Thank you! I understand a bit better now.
 
this did not help at all lol. so no one knows the answer?
 
Why do you think that the thread was no help? What is your question?
Read the Forum rules. We must not not give out full solutions.


ehild
 
Last edited:
Back
Top