How to calculate the size and orientation of a tidal bulge

  • Thread starter Thread starter em370
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orientation Tidal
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the size of a tidal bulge created by the moon, one must consider the gravitational forces between the Earth and the moon, factoring in the opposing gravitational pull of the Earth’s mass. The calculation involves determining the net gravitational force and how it affects the distribution of water, including the loss of compression in the bulge area. Additionally, due to the Earth's rotation, the tidal bulge will be slightly ahead of the moon, which can be quantified by analyzing the gravitational influence of the bulge on the moon's acceleration. For broader applicability, the formulas used can be adapted to other celestial bodies by adjusting the parameters for their specific masses and distances. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate tidal predictions.
em370
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
How would one go about calculating the size of a tidal bulge created by the moon? I know how to calculate the gravity between two points and to calculate the attractive force of matter to the center of the Earth in the bulge you would subtract its opposite direction attraction to the matter, but how would you do this with a large amount of matter and be able to calculate the loss in compression in that area? Also, because the Earth spins faster than the moon the bulge would be ahead of the the moon causing it to speed up due to a slight increase in gravity from the direction of the bulge. How would you be able to calculate how far ahead of the moon the bulge would be? I am specifically asking about the Earth and moon but would appreciate it if the formulas could be expanded so that they could be viable for other orbiting bodies.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top