Calculating Perpendicular Point on a Line in 2D Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Asuralm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the point C that makes AC perpendicular to BC on a line L in a 2D plane, the relationship involves substituting C into the equation and ensuring the inner product <AC, BC> equals zero. The vectors AC and BC can be expressed in terms of the line's parameters and points A and B. The inner product simplifies to an expression involving the dot products of these vectors, but without specific values for A, B, v0, and n, further simplification is challenging. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving a more straightforward solution without concrete data. Ultimately, the mathematical relationship remains intricate and requires specific inputs for resolution.
Asuralm
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi all:

Given a line L:v= v0+t*n; and two points A, B in 2D plane; A and B are on the two sides of the line L. I want to calculate the point C which makes AC is perpendicular to BC

I know it's simply that substitude v to C and <AC, BC>=0. But I don't know how to simplify the equation.

Could anyone help me please?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Asuralm said:
Hi all:

Given a line L:v= v0+t*n; and two points A, B in 2D plane; A and B are on the two sides of the line L. I want to calculate the point C which makes AC is perpendicular to BC
C is on L?

I know it's simply that substitude v to C and <AC, BC>=0. But I don't know how to simplify the equation.

Could anyone help me please?

Thanks
The vector AC= v0+ t*n is given by v0+ t*n-A. The vector BC is given by v0+ t*n- B.
Their inner product <AC,BC>= <v0+ t*n- A,v0+ t*n- B>= |v0- t*n|2- <v0+ t*n,A+B>+ <A,B>.
Without specific values for A and B, v0 and n, I don't see how you can get any simpler than that.
 
should this |v0- t*n|2- <v0+ t*n,A+B>+ <A,B>

be <v0+t*n, v0+t*n> - <v0+t*n, A+B> + <A, B> ?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top