How to characterize a power law field?

AI Thread Summary
Power law fields, defined by the equation F = -K/r^n, are central forces that can be recognized through the analysis of trajectories of moving points. Specifically, calculating motion for various values of n can help identify the nature of the field based on observed trajectories. Closed non-circular orbits are unique to n=2 and n=-1 cases. In cosmology, power law fields are predominantly n=2, while interactions at infinitesimal scales require consideration of quantum mechanics, complicating the analysis. Understanding these characteristics aids in applying theoretical models to real-world scenarios.
Moleculmol
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, as part of the study of fields with central forces, I came across with fields called power law, defined by F = - K/r ^ n u
(u is radial vector passing through the origin O)
I would like to dismiss case n = 2, which refers to the Newtonian fields whose study was exhaustively conducted in class. My questions are:
-How to recognize a power law field from the trajectory of a moving material point in this field?
- Once the nature of the field identified (power law), the determination of the power n can be conjectured by reasoning on heuristic considerations, however are there any situations where one can resort to theoretical models to find this coefficient (I think for example to VanderWalls force but I would like another example).
- An example of application of these methods to a concrete physical situation, in cosmology (movement of the stars) or interactions between particles at infinitesimal scale.
Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moleculmol said:
Summary: In classic mechanics, central forces with the form -k/r^n are often introduced to model actions that are directed along the line joining the object and the origin.

-How to recognize a power law field from the trajectory of a moving material point in this field?
Calculate how the motion will look like for different powers, then do the opposite if you have a given trajectory. n=2 and n=-1 are the only cases that lead to closed non-circular orbits.
Moleculmol said:
- An example of application of these methods to a concrete physical situation, in cosmology (movement of the stars) or interactions between particles at infinitesimal scale.
Well, on large scales these are all n=2, on small scales you probably have to consider quantum mechanics and things get more complicated.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top