How to Choose the Right Faculty for Undergraduate Research in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter proton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research
AI Thread Summary
A community college student applying for an undergraduate research program at UCSB is uncertain about which faculty member to choose, given their lack of upper-division coursework and interest in theoretical physics, particularly astrophysics or mathematical physics. The discussion highlights that at the undergraduate level, the specific area of research may be less critical than gaining research experience itself. It is suggested that focusing on the quality of the undergraduate program, including course offerings and preparation for graduate school, is more important than specializing too early. The student ultimately decided to apply to work with condensed matter professors, despite a preference for theoretical areas, believing that experimental research might be more beneficial.
proton
Messages
349
Reaction score
0
I'm a community college student applying for a undergrad reserach program at UCSB, but I don't know which faculty member to choose. I haven't taken any upperdiv classes yet so I don't know which area of physics to pursue for grad school, but for now, I want to theoretical physics, in perhaps astrophysics or mathematical physics. But is it wise to do research in theoretical physics right now? or would it be smarter to do experimental, such as condensed matter or experimental high energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My experience (however little) would suggest that at the undergraduate level, the type of research you do isn't as important as the fact that you've done research. Theoretical astrophysics, mathematical physics, it doesn't really matter, so long as you've done some good research experience. To be honest, I'd focus more on the undergrad program itself: the classes they offer, how well they'll prepare you for graduate school, and other things of that nature. Graduate school is the time to figure out what area of physics you want to go into. Heck, my senior thesis was in space physics (not to be confused with astrophysics), and this summer in grad school I'm doing work on high energy astrophysics. Obviously if you do a lot of work in one area, you'll become quite adept at it. But now isn't really the time for you to specialize. Heck, I'll be a first year grad student this May, and it isn't even time for me to specialize!
 
Ah its too late. I already submitted the application just before you responded. I chose condensed matter professors even though I would rather do mathematical physics or astrophysics, because I thought that an experimental area would be better. Oh well, not a big problem
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top