Which Journal is Better: Royal Chemical Society or Materials Science Forum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oxygenne
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between publishing in Royal Chemical Society Journals, such as Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, and Materials Science Forum by Trans Tech Publications. Key points include the importance of selecting a journal that aligns with the paper's content to maximize acceptance chances. The impact factor is a significant consideration, but the participants emphasize that the decision should also depend on the specific research area and the guidance of experienced colleagues or supervisors. There is a suggestion to consult a librarian for impact factor information, highlighting the necessity of having supportive collaborators for critique and editing to enhance publication prospects. Concerns about workplace dynamics and the reluctance to seek advice from colleagues are also mentioned, indicating a complex environment for decision-making.
Oxygenne
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
What should be better journal to publish
Royal Chemical Society Journals (eg Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics ) or Materials Science Forum (Trans Tech Publications)?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The journal with the highest impact factor?
 
Oxygenne said:
What should be better journal to publish
Royal Chemical Society Journals (eg Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics ) or Materials Science Forum (Trans Tech Publications)?
Thank you!

This question has as much meaning as my question here:

"What color suits me better - purple or pink?"

If you say that it depends on my skin complexion, other outfit am I wearing, etc.. etc., then BINGO!

Furthermore, shouldn't someone within your collaboration (or your supervisor/boss) would have a clue on where to publish? They certainly would know more than strangers on an internet forum!

Zz.
 
I second what ZapperZ says, of course.

The reason we cannot possibly answer your question is that it depends on a number of things - not least of all the content in your paper. You want to (presumably) maximize the chances the paper will be accepted and published. Then, if you submit to a journal that isn't known for carrying your type of work you're in the wrong place.

Are you a grad student or? Like Zapper says, someone you are working with should know where to submit to.
 
eXorikos said:
The journal with the highest impact factor?

this is what i would like to do but I do not know how to find which of those has an higher impact factor.
Thank you!
 
Oxygenne said:
this is what i would like to do but I do not know how to find which of those has an higher impact factor.
Thank you!

Ask a librarian. That's what they get paid to do.

It is still puzzling that you do not have anyone at your institution or collaborators who you can ask.

Zz.
 
Also if you don't have people that go through the paper to critique and edit it, it's extremely unlikely that it's going to get published anywhere.
 
ZapperZ said:
It is still puzzling that you do not have anyone at your institution or collaborators who you can ask.
Zz.

This is because my boss is not the person to ask us about us and he is asking others about ask, so I do not want to ask my colleagues about this as they can say to him about our discussion and he knows we have different opinion on this.
Not always the situation is excellent but better in this lab than jobless.

twofish-quant said:
Also if you don't have people that go through the paper to critique and edit it, it's extremely unlikely that it's going to get published anywhere.
I will do this! Thank you!
 
How is the impact factor 1.742?
Thank you!
 
Back
Top