How to Combine Equations to Solve an Exact ODE for H(x, y) = c?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    equations Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving an exact ordinary differential equation (ODE) represented by the function H(x, y) = c. The participants detail the process of combining two equations for H, leading to the conclusion that H(x, y) = x²y - xy + (y²/2). The derivation involves recognizing that the functions ξ₁(y) and ξ₂(x) are single-variable functions, resulting in the relationship ξ₂(x) = c. The final differential equation derived is (2xy - y)dx + (-x + y + x²)dy = 0, confirming that H(x, y) is indeed an exact equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exact differential equations
  • Familiarity with functions of multiple variables
  • Knowledge of total differentials in calculus
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of exact differential equations in detail
  • Learn about the method of integrating factors for non-exact equations
  • Explore the implications of total differentials in multivariable calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between partial derivatives and exactness of ODEs
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as researchers and professionals dealing with multivariable calculus and its applications.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1716444809818.png

1716444830751.png

Does someone please know how they combined the two equations for H to get the finial equation ##H(x,y) = .... = c##?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this problem,
View attachment 345763
View attachment 345764
Does someone please know how they combined the two equations for H to get the finial equation ##H(x,y) = .... = c##?

Thanks!
Take ##H-H## using both expressions. You find that
$$
0=H-H = \xi_1(y) - \frac{y^2}{2} - \xi_2(x)
$$
Moving the ##x##-dependent term to the LHS
$$
\xi_2(x) = \xi_1(y) - \frac{y^2}{2}
$$
The LHS depends only on ##x##, but the RHS does not depend on ##x## so both sides must be equal to the same constant ##-c##. It follows that
$$\xi_2(x) = c$$
and so
$$-xy +\frac{y^2}{2} + x^2y = c$$
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Here's another way to explain how they came up with H(x, y).

In the first screen shot of the OP, the author found that ##H(x, y) = x^2 - xy + \xi_1(y)## and that ##H(x, y) = -xy + \frac{y^2}2 + x^2y + \xi_2(x)##. The ##\xi_i## functions are functions of a single variable only.

Since the 2nd version of H(x, y) contains a term in y alone, namely ##\frac{y^2}2##, this means that ##\xi_1(y) = \frac{y^2}2##. Also, since the 1st version of H contains no term in x alone, this means that ##\xi_2(x) = 0##. After all, both versions of H(x, y) must be the same.

Hence ##H(x, y) = x^2y - xy + \frac{y^2}2##

The differential equation that was derived from the original pair of equations (that involved t) is ##(2xy - y)dx +(-x + y + x^2)dy = 0##. This can be seen as ##\frac{\partial H(x, y)}{\partial x}dx + \frac{\partial H(x, y)}{\partial y} dy = 0##.

The LHS of the last equation is the total differential of H(x, y). Since the total differential is zero, it must be true that H(x, y) = c, a constant.

BTW, the thread title is misleading, since the equation you're dealing with is exact, not inexact.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Thank you for your replies @Orodruin and @Mark44!

Sorry there is a typo in the title. It should be a exact equation.

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mark44

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
980
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K