How to construct gamma matrices with two lower spinor indices for any dimension?

Osiris
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Generally, Gamma matrices with one lower and one upper indices could be constructed based on the Clifford algebra.
\begin{equation}
\gamma^{i}\gamma^{j}+\gamma^{j}\gamma^{i}=2h^{ij},
\end{equation}

My question is how to generally construct gamma matrices with two lower indices. There should be at least two ways.
1). construct and use the charge conjugation matrix to lower one spinor index in the gamma matrix;
2). use inner product to directly obtain the gamma matrices with two lower spinor indices, something like $$<\Gamma e_{\alpha}, e_{\beta}>=\Gamma_{\alpha,\beta}$$, where $$e_{\alpha}$$ are the basis element.

In even dimensions (D=2m), consider
complex Grassmann algebra $$\Lambda_{m}[\alpha^{1},...,\alpha^{m}]$$ with
generators $$\alpha^{1},...,\alpha^{m}.$$) Namely, we define $$\widehat{\alpha
}^{i}$$ and $$\widehat{\beta}_{i}$$ as multiplication and differentiation
operators:
\begin{equation}
\widehat{\alpha}^{i}\psi=\alpha^{i}\psi,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\widehat{\beta}_{i}\psi=\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha ^{i}}\psi.
\end{equation}

According to the Grassmann algebra, we have
\begin{equation}
\widehat{\alpha}^{i}\widehat{\alpha}^{j}+\widehat{\alpha}^{j}\widehat{\alpha}^{i}=0,
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\widehat{\beta}_{i}\widehat{\beta}_{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j} \widehat{\beta}_{i}=0
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\widehat{\alpha}^{i}\widehat{\beta}_{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j} \widehat{\alpha}^{i}=delta_{j}^{i}
\end{equation}

This means that $$\widehat{\alpha}^{1},...,\widehat{\alpha}^{m}, \widehat{\beta}_{1},...,\widehat{\beta}_{m}$$ specify a representation of Clifford algebra
for some choice of $h$ (namely, for $h$ corresponding to quadratic form
$$\frac{1}{2}(x^{1}x^{m+1}+x^{2}x^{m+2}+...+x^{m}x^{2m})$$). It follows that
operators
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^{j}=\widehat{\alpha}^{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j},1\leq j\leq m,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^{j}=\widehat{\alpha}^{j-m}-\widehat{\beta}_{j-m},m<j\leq2m,
\end{equation}
determine a representation of $Cl(m,m,\mathbb{C})$


For example, in $D=4$, we can obtain
$$\Gamma^{1}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
1&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
0&
0&
0&
1\\
0&
0&
1&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$,
$$\Gamma^{2}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
0&
0&
1\\
0&
0&
{-1}&
0\\
0&
{-1}&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$,
$$\Gamma^{3}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
{-1}&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
0&
0&
0&
1\\
0&
0&
{-1}&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$,
$$\Gamma^{4}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
0&
0&
{-1}\\
0&
0&
1&
0\\
0&
{-1}&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$


My question is how to generally construct the charge conjugation matrix C, so that we could have
$$C\Gamma C^{-1}=+/-\Gamma^T$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any tips will be greatly appreciated.
:)
 
If you are looking for the charge conjugation matrix in various dimensions then check out the back of Polchinski's "String Theory Volume 2". Appendix B has everything you'll need.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top